On Fri, 2008-04-04 at 06:02 -0400, Curtis Wanner wrote: > Koki wrote: > > Correct me if I am wrong, but I sense that you are upset, and I find > > that unfortunate. Can we please try to have a constructive (and > > friendly) discussion instead? :) > > > > The page was formatted in a certain way, following a certain logic and > > consistent with the rest of the website. I think I can understand why > > you may find this format disruptive to your eye, but this way of > > indenting provides a better visual way of distinguishing/separating the > > bullet lists; in my experience, this form of indenting is common > > practice both in print and on the web, and more importantly, it is also > > consistent with our theme. That's the reason why I reverted the change > > that you made and explained why I did it. > > My apologies if I was a bit harsh, but I felt your reply was a bit > condescending. A simple reply "I have reverted this change because I'd > prefer to keep with the theme." would have sufficed over an explanation of > what is a bulleted list, etc. I felt my original email was enough to > explain that I knew I was breaking away with standard theme. IMHO this page > comes across as more of a table of contents than an article. Clearly you > don't view it this way, so I'm agreeing to disagree. :P No problem. I did not mean to sound condescending. I gave a rather long explanation instead of simply reverting your changes without much detail because I did not want to come across as being dictatorial. I guess there is always a risk of being misinterpreted on email, no matter how you write things. :) Anyway, this is not koki.org that we are talking about, so if the people on this list disagree with what I do, please say so, and let's have a constructive discussion. That is what this list is for after all. Cheers, Koki ----------------------------------------------------------------------- haiku-web@xxxxxxxxxxxxx - Haiku Web & Developer Support Discussion List