On Fri, Jun 4, 2010 at 14:37, Matt Madia <mattmadia@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > woot, seems like we're OK with PDFLib. > > Looking at PDFLib's readme*1 & license*2,3, since our codebase uses > the MIT license(which is an approved license*4) our codebase should be > exempt from needing the commercial license, according to Sections 2 > and 2.1 in PDF Lite License. > > I guess we could send a quick email to License inquiries: > sales@xxxxxxxxxx , as a matter of courtesy & confirmation. This has been confirmed by PDFlib GmbH. --mmadia