Hi,
On Mon, Jul 30, 2018 at 4:52 PM Adrien Destugues <pulkomandy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
30 juillet 2018 16:19 "Dario Casalinuovo" <b.vitruvio@xxxxxxxxx> a écrit:
considered setting up a privateSome of the Haiku developers were rightfully annoyed by this. We
discuss things. Eventually,mailing list, where only the contributors with commit access could
working in an open way,this option was rejected, because the Haiku project tries to continue
proof of this.and let everyone a chance to express their ideas.
Can you send me any reference of where this has been discussed?
Since you like to discuss things openly, I expect you can give me some
Was this voted? If so where?
Most of the discussion was during lunchtime, at the coding sprint that
followed BeGeistert
where Sia Lang did not show up to present his work.
after discussing
the matters, not by voting and putting the "yes" and "no" camps against
each other, unless
we really can't achieve that (it happens very rarely).
I like this way of doing things,
because it allows for compromises, and there is no one losing the vote in
the end. It has
a downside which is that sometimes a discussion never reaches an
agreement, and things stay
as they were, so it may take considerable effort to convince everyone that
a change is
necessary. I think this is fine, maybe because I tend to resist change in
general. I prefer
"if it works, don't fix it" to "move fast and break things".
At that time we reached the conclusion that a private mailing list would
be a bad idea,
with a restricted
set of people, they already had e-mail address from everyone, and doing it
this way reminds
them that contacting a subset of people directly and privately should be
kept for very specific
cases where going public is not desirable.
