[haiku-development] Re: Voting on Alpha 1 proposals now closed
- From: "Urias McCullough" <umccullough@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: haiku-development@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Tue, 23 Sep 2008 10:06:21 -0700
2008/9/23 Humdinger <humdingerb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
> Urias McCullough wrote:
>
>> It was not obvious during the proposal phase, and voting phase,
>> whether the vote was to designate those tasks as "blockers" for the
>> Alpha 1, or whether to include them if they were available.
> --snip
>>
>> I guess this may have been a slight communication issue about the
>> purpose of the propositions, as some were clearly targeting blockers,
>> while others were simply asking for inclusion in the Alpha release (if
>> they're done).
>
> Well, it wasn't so much a communications problem, but a reading
> comprehension issue... :)
>
> I quote from the page from when the voting was active:
>
>
> "About what you are voting for:
>
> * This vote is about requirements for alpha 1. This means that voting in
> favor for something means that you want this feature to be absolutely for
> sure in the alpha. So for example, if you vote in favor for # 9 (fully
> integrate IO scheduler), you actually say that you want the release blocked
> until this feature is finished.
> * In this same vain, voting against making a proposal mandatory for
> release, does not mean that in the end this feature will not end up in the
> release. For example, if the I/O scheduler does not get enough votes to
> become necessary, but it is finished in time, it might as well end up in the
> package. Of course, this does not work for bundled software vote."
Ah thanks for clarifying, so in that case, I suspect I voted properly
based on my own opinions ;)
> So there. ;)
> Humdinger
- Urias
Other related posts:
