On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 2:01 PM, Ingo Weinhold <ingo_weinhold@xxxxxx> wrote: > > On 2010-04-12 at 18:22:17 [+0200], Alexandre Moreira > <alexandream@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> The Queries use the fact that the inode has it's file name inside it, >> but two different names mapping one inode would mean only one would >> show up in queries. Is that correct? > > No, not really. Queries should return all matching *entries*. I.e. if only > node attributes (i.e. not the file name) are involved, for a matching node > with multiple entries all entries would have to be returned. > Yeah, but that's sort of my point: At least from what (I understand of what) the book says (I don't know if that's still like that), the current implementation is incapable of returning more than one reference to the same inode, because it uses the name stored in the inode and there's currently only one. But nevermind that, I was just raising a topic on one hurdle that could be unnoticed so far :) > CU, Ingo > >