"Ithamar R. Adema" <ithamar.adema@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Besides all this there is a certain amount of cleanup to do in the > current printing architecture, as there's a whole lot of shared code > floating about at different places in the Haiku source tree that > should, > IMNSHO should be integrated into the print_server. A discussion on > this, > especially wether or not we want to keep R5 backwards compatibility > on > printer driver/transport add on level would be appropriate (dropping > that would make it possible to have a much cleaner addon structure > for > the print_server, making all this much easier). > > I was planning to discuss a lot of this @ BeGeistert, but an earlier > discussion on the list wouldn't hurt either I guess... Then bring it on! :-) If we get CUPS, I don't think keeping backwards compatibility is important at all, BTW. However, I'm not really familiar with the current architecture, so I probably don't see the improvements a new one would give us :-) Bye, Axel.