Ingo Weinhold <bonefish@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > queue: 86 4d 32 6b 92 29 36 > > last acquired by: 134, count: 1024 > > last released by: 134, count: 1 > Unless I'm mistaken, this means, the thread has acquired the > semaphore with > count 1024 (as write lock) and then released it with count 1 (as read > lock). > > Since the commit list still seems to be out of order, I haven't seen > Axel's > recent commits, but I guess one of them is to blame. I'll have a > look. In this case the above should read: last acquired by: -134, count: 1024 It looks more like it first had a read lock, and then later acquired a write lock that it still owns. Bye, Axel.