On Wed, Mar 2, 2011 at 4:40 PM, Oliver Tappe <zooey@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On 2011-03-02 at 22:32:13 [+0100], François Revol <revol@xxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > > -haikuRequiredLegacyGCCVersion="2.95.3-haiku-100818" > > > +haikuRequiredLegacyGCCVersion="2.95.3-110228" > > > export haikuRequiredLegacyGCCVersion > > > # version of legacy gcc required to build haiku > > > > Shouldn't we keep it as long as it's not an official port with upstreamed > > patches ? > > Why should we? It's neither being maintained upstream nor do we declare any > other of our ports this way. > What about Jam, doesn't that have a Haiku designation? And it isn't maintained upstream. I think the Haiku designation indicates that it is not a stock gcc2 release. John Scipione