[haiku-commits] Re: r40783 - haiku/branches/features/package-management
- From: Oliver Tappe <zooey@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: haiku-commits@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Fri, 04 Mar 2011 12:26:36 +0100
On 2011-03-03 at 23:35:35 [+0100], Axel Dörfler <axeld@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
> Oliver Tappe <zooey@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > Yeah, right, jam. So we have *two* packages that use an explicit
> > 'haiku'
> > designation. All the optional packages don't and many of these are no
> > stock
> > releases either.
> > So are you suggesting we add a haiku designation to all the patched
> > ones?
>
> I think for GCC it makes some sense, as it's a GCC flavor that only
> produces Haiku executables.
Huh? Every compiler I know only produces binaries for a single target.
AFAICS, that's not the reason why one is supposed to add a specific hint to
the version, but it's because we have applied haiku-specific patches to
gcc-2.95.3 that aren't available anywhere else (so the compiler behaves
differently).
> I guess the SuSE way would be enough,
> though, but some sort of designation sounds like a good idea to me.
Ok, I appended " (Haiku)" in r40802.
cheers,
Oliver
Other related posts:
