[haiku-commits] Re: r40783 - haiku/branches/features/package-management

  • From: Oliver Tappe <zooey@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: haiku-commits@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Fri, 04 Mar 2011 12:26:36 +0100

On 2011-03-03 at 23:35:35 [+0100], Axel Dörfler <axeld@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> 
> Oliver Tappe <zooey@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > Yeah, right, jam. So we have *two* packages that use an explicit
> > 'haiku'
> > designation. All the optional packages don't and many of these are no
> > stock
> > releases either.
> > So are you suggesting we add a haiku designation to all the patched
> > ones?
> I think for GCC it makes some sense, as it's a GCC flavor that only
> produces Haiku executables. 

Huh? Every compiler I know only produces binaries for a single target. 
AFAICS, that's not the reason why one is supposed to add a specific hint to 
the version, but it's because we have applied haiku-specific patches to 
gcc-2.95.3 that aren't available anywhere else (so the compiler behaves 

> I guess the SuSE way would be enough,
> though, but some sort of designation sounds like a good idea to me.

Ok, I appended " (Haiku)" in r40802.


Other related posts: