Oliver Tappe <zooey@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Yeah, right, jam. So we have *two* packages that use an explicit > 'haiku' > designation. All the optional packages don't and many of these are no > stock > releases either. > So are you suggesting we add a haiku designation to all the patched > ones? I think for GCC it makes some sense, as it's a GCC flavor that only produces Haiku executables. I guess the SuSE way would be enough, though, but some sort of designation sounds like a good idea to me. For jam, it also makes sense, as it's not a plain Jam, but has grown specific features to suit our build system. An alternative would be to rename it as FreeType has chosen to do. Maybe some ham will help us out some day, though :-) Bye, Axel.