On 2010-05-04 at 16:09:36 [+0200], Axel Dörfler <axeld@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Hi Karsten, > > host <host.haiku@xxxxxx> wrote: > > I can only agree wholeheartedly! I agree a style guide is needed > > but the current attitude hinders me up to 90% to come back to > > Haiku coding. > > Can you please be a bit more specific what attitude you are talking > about? You really don't understand, do you? It's the attitude that every little violation needs pointing out, even if it is unimportant by reasonable definition. I explained at length why I think there are unimportant and more important issues to point out. These being pointed out can and does cause frustration. If you can't see why, I don't know how to help you. > This also goes to Stephan: what is wrong about what Jérôme did? He just > pointed out a coding style issue in your code. The only attitude problem > that I see is what you are pulling off here. So you misunderstood the > coding style guide, big deal. As I said, if you have a problem with the > current wording, improve it. He did not point out a coding style issue, he more or less asked if it was one, which then lead to a discussion, which then caused the frustration I have obviously built up to spill. It's not Jérôme's fault, like I said he didn't even exactly point out a style violation, it's only when you showed your refusal to acknowledge the room for interpretation when I got all frustrated. If you can't understand why I and apparently others feel the way we do, I don't really know what I can tell you. I've already tried to explain in it detail. Best regards, -Stephan