On Thu, May 6, 2010 at 07:05, Axel Dörfler <axeld@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Stephan Assmus <superstippi@xxxxxx> wrote: >> That'd be perfect, I am really glad you make this suggestion. We >> could >> proceed either by everyone quoting the coding style guide with remarks >> on >> what they find important and unimportant, or someone could come up >> with a >> suggestion and we could refine that until we are all happy. > > I guess that either way would work, but I think it would be best if > someone compiles a list of questionable items, then we should have a > heated discussion about those that either ends in consensus or with a > vote. For the sake of R1/Alpha 2, can that part of this discussion be delayed until the release is made? Especially since at this point, we're in agreement on a course of action to be take. --mmadia