[gmpi] Re: where we at
- From: Tim Hockin <thockin@xxxxxxxxxx>
- To: gmpi@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Mon, 4 Aug 2003 14:23:56 -0700 (PDT)
> a) Yes. A plugin-global flag indicates a plugins ability to do this.
> This tells the host that ANY input buffer may be re-used on ANY output
> (perhaps withing some higher-level grouping of stuff (think MIDI
> channel?)). If a plug can not accept this rule, it must not use
> in-place processing. (VST model?)
>
> c) Yes. A plugin is given inputs and produces it's own output buffers
> based on internal knowledge or other variables. The host is not
> involved, except to furnish new buffers as requested. The plugin must
> re-use or release all input buffers. Variations on this can be devised
> to allowed shared input/outputs. (baton passing, or similar to DX
> model)
Either no one cares again, or everyone is busy. Does anyone ACTUALLY want
this to succeed?
Summary:
A: Jeff McClintock, Steve Harris
C: Ron Kuper, Tim Hockin
other: Vincent Burel, Mike Berry
none: EVERYONE ELSE
This is feeling more and more like a waste of energy.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Generalized Music Plugin Interface (GMPI) public discussion list
Participation in this list is contingent upon your abiding by the
following rules: Please stay on topic. You are responsible for your own
words. Please respect your fellow subscribers. Please do not
redistribute anyone else's words without their permission.
Archive: //www.freelists.org/archives/gmpi
Email gmpi-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx w/ subject "unsubscribe" to unsubscribe
Other related posts:
