[gmpi] Re: where we at
- From: Tim Hockin <thockin@xxxxxxxxxx>
- To: gmpi@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Mon, 4 Aug 2003 20:37:57 -0700 (PDT)
> tim and others on the LAD list got a long way in their efforts to
> forge ahead with XAP, which was an attempt to learn directly from all
> the existing APIs that were reasonable openly documented. that effort
> was suspended when GMPI appeared because of the potential of a truly
> cross-platform API emerging from the effort.
There was talk of re-awakening XAP. I still have some hope left for GMPI.
When I dredge out the XAP notes again is when I have essentially given up on
GMPI.
> *surrounded* by prototypes. prototypes are not the problem: reaching a
> decision over which of several possibly pathways through the potential
> design solutions is.
Perhaps I focus too much on details, but THAT is what seems to be the
important. Fundamental issues that relate to the overall model.
Also, I apologize for seemingly taking over things. I know Ron is busy, and
no one has complained, so I've just kept it up. Anyone who'd do a better
job is welcome to do so, I just warn you that I am an opinionated bastard.
:)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Generalized Music Plugin Interface (GMPI) public discussion list
Participation in this list is contingent upon your abiding by the
following rules: Please stay on topic. You are responsible for your own
words. Please respect your fellow subscribers. Please do not
redistribute anyone else's words without their permission.
Archive: //www.freelists.org/archives/gmpi
Email gmpi-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx w/ subject "unsubscribe" to unsubscribe
Other related posts:
