[gmpi] Re: Topic 7.2: In-place processing
- From: David Olofson <david@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: gmpi@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Tue, 3 Jun 2003 00:30:33 +0200
On Tuesday 03 June 2003 00.00, Tim Hockin wrote:
[...]
> > > So, to play devil's advocate:
> > >
> > > Does it really win us anything? It is mildly more complex, and
> > > is a potential source for bugs. Even though I dreamed it up
> > > (not knowing anything about DX), I want to see the Right Answer
> > > chosen.
> >
> > It's quite obvious that silence support makes a huge difference
> > in
>
> This wasn't about SILENCE support - this was about inputs and
> outputs and process-in-place. :)
Oops, mixing up the threads there...! :-)
Both comments sort of apply to both threads, though; that's why I
didn't react on it.
//David Olofson - Programmer, Composer, Open Source Advocate
.- The Return of Audiality! --------------------------------.
| Free/Open Source Audio Engine for use in Games or Studio. |
| RT and off-line synth. Scripting. Sample accurate timing. |
`-----------------------------------> http://audiality.org -'
--- http://olofson.net --- http://www.reologica.se ---
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Generalized Music Plugin Interface (GMPI) public discussion list
Participation in this list is contingent upon your abiding by the
following rules: Please stay on topic. You are responsible for your own
words. Please respect your fellow subscribers. Please do not
redistribute anyone else's words without their permission.
Archive: //www.freelists.org/archives/gmpi
Email gmpi-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx w/ subject "unsubscribe" to unsubscribe
Other related posts:
