On Sat, Jun 26, 2004 at 01:46:52PM -0400, Ron Kuper wrote: > The process we set out last year was to have a public requirements > phase, followed by a members-only implementation phase, followed by a > public approval/revision phase, followed by a members-only ratification. > > Yes, the implementation is a private effort. But there's a good chance > that the MMA membership rules and fees will be amended to make it easier > for more of you to participate in the design phase of the spec... not > that it's really that hard to become a member today. > > When we do the implementation, we will build a spec and standard that > meets the requirements this group comes up with. If the implementors go > off and do their own thing they will have failed. That is about what I remembered. Thanks for clarifying. Tim ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Generalized Music Plugin Interface (GMPI) public discussion list Participation in this list is contingent upon your abiding by the following rules: Please stay on topic. You are responsible for your own words. Please respect your fellow subscribers. Please do not redistribute anyone else's words without their permission. Archive: //www.freelists.org/archives/gmpi Email gmpi-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx w/ subject "unsubscribe" to unsubscribe