[gmpi] Re: 3.18 Copy Protection
- From: Tim Hockin <thockin@xxxxxxxxxx>
- To: gmpi@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Mon, 20 Sep 2004 15:35:51 -0700
On Mon, Sep 20, 2004 at 06:23:19PM -0400, Ron Kuper wrote:
> >>>
> I mean, we *really* don't want to encourage plugs that are locked to
> hosts.
> <<<
>
> But *we*, Cakewalk, require this. Plugin vendors that we've worked with
> want to protect their reputation, they don't want their DSP crown jewels
> shared so easily. They like the idea of locking their bundled plugin to
> the host with which it was bundled.
Bundled plugins are, fortunately, the short list. Since they arethe
exception, maybe it's ok to make this "locking" be the exception, too?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Generalized Music Plugin Interface (GMPI) public discussion list
Participation in this list is contingent upon your abiding by the
following rules: Please stay on topic. You are responsible for your own
words. Please respect your fellow subscribers. Please do not
redistribute anyone else's words without their permission.
Archive: //www.freelists.org/archives/gmpi
Email gmpi-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx w/ subject "unsubscribe" to unsubscribe
Other related posts:
