[gmpi] Re: 3.11 topic: Multi-timbrality and parameters
- From: "Koen Tanghe" <koen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <gmpi@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 30 Apr 2004 01:27:47 +0200
On Friday, April 30, 2004 1:05 AM [GMT+1=CET],
Jeff McClintock <xxxjeffmcc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hi Chris,
>
>> But if the only part of OSC we're thinking of
>> using is the addressing notation, ... we're totally gutting OSC and any
>> actual interop with OSC is out the window
>
> If the OSC naming convention is logical and suits us, use it.
>
> GMPI dosn't have to *be* OSC, but compatible naming makes GMPI/OSC
> interaction easier, that's not "totally gutting OSC".
Yes, that were my thougts too when reading that ;-)
Koen
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Generalized Music Plugin Interface (GMPI) public discussion list
Participation in this list is contingent upon your abiding by the
following rules: Please stay on topic. You are responsible for your own
words. Please respect your fellow subscribers. Please do not
redistribute anyone else's words without their permission.
Archive: //www.freelists.org/archives/gmpi
Email gmpi-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx w/ subject "unsubscribe" to unsubscribe
Other related posts:
