Why not just use OSC? Original Message: ----------------- From: Koen Tanghe koen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Date: Thu, 29 Apr 2004 01:23:13 +0200 To: gmpi@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: [gmpi] Re: 3.11 topic: Multi-timbrality and parameters On Wednesday, April 28, 2004 10:19 PM [GMT+1=CET], Chris Grigg <xxxgmpi-public@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > I'd be curious to hear Koen's take on all this. I do think shooting > down modules is a bad idea. Sorry, busy, I've just been quickly skimming through the posts here... Not much experience with synth configurations I must say. I do like the gerenic OSC-style indexing mechanism. About modules: I'll need to read some mails better to see what you actually mean with modules and what the issues are (I guess re-explaining it in one mail would be a bit boring for you guys after all the discussions ;-)). I'll try to catch up tomorrow... Koen ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Generalized Music Plugin Interface (GMPI) public discussion list Participation in this list is contingent upon your abiding by the following rules: Please stay on topic. You are responsible for your own words. Please respect your fellow subscribers. Please do not redistribute anyone else's words without their permission. Archive: //www.freelists.org/archives/gmpi Email gmpi-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx w/ subject "unsubscribe" to unsubscribe -------------------------------------------------------------------- mail2web - Check your email from the web at http://mail2web.com/ . ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Generalized Music Plugin Interface (GMPI) public discussion list Participation in this list is contingent upon your abiding by the following rules: Please stay on topic. You are responsible for your own words. Please respect your fellow subscribers. Please do not redistribute anyone else's words without their permission. Archive: //www.freelists.org/archives/gmpi Email gmpi-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx w/ subject "unsubscribe" to unsubscribe