Dear Regner,1 I didn't call you a liar check my e-mail at the bottom! I inferred that you may, unwittingly, be passing on other peoples lies. 2 On what do you base your morals? No need to reply - I merely sent this because it was an obvious question to raise. Let's stick to geocentrism.
Jack----- Original Message ----- From: "Regner Trampedach" <art@xxxxxxxxxx>
To: <geocentrism@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Sent: Tuesday, November 13, 2007 2:25 AM Subject: [geocentrism] Re: Two spin axes of Earth?
Science based on lies will quickly fail and be weeded out. That's where science differ from many other enterprices in life. I am one of those scientists - I have often found, not lies, but poor approximations, in other peoples work - and have sought to improve that. My work is based on what you call lies - and it wouldn't work if it wasall lies. So if I say it works, I must also be one of your lying scientists. You cannot call science a lie, and then say that I, one of those scientists,am O.K. and not a liar.And, yes, I do have moral values - I though that obvious from what I wrote.Since it wasn't and I don't have time, I will give your offer a pass. How wonderful to be called a nihilistic liar, now and then. - Regner- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -Quoting Jack Lewis <jack.lewis@xxxxxxxxxxxx>:Dear Regner, I don't call you a liar personally but you may well be passing on otherpeoples lies.