[geocentrism] Re: Stars in Moon pictures
- From: Regner Trampedach <art@xxxxxxxxxx>
- To: geocentrism@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Fri, 16 Nov 2007 12:20:13 +1100
> More cause for wonder at why no stars are "allowed" on our lunar sourced
> pictures??? .. Yes guilty of "pauls paranoia" as charged..
>
Take a picture of the full moon, which doesn't over-expose the Moon, i.e.,
you can still see craters on the Moon. You won't see any stars (you might
see some bright planets...). The stars are so much fainter than the Moon.
The reason WE can see them, is that our eyes have a larger dynamic range
than both photographic emulsions and charge-coupled devices (CCDs).
Over and out.
Regards,
Regner
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Quoting philip madsen <pma15027@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
> Changed thread.
>
> Dear Philip,
> I don't advise swearing to God about anything especially that which aint!
> Jack
>
> Seems like some of that Catholic doctrine is still sticking to you.. but you
> are correct.
>
> Re camera on the moon, perhaps we should get out of earth orbit and
> concentrate on an example at home.
>
> If a camera on earth takes 24 hours to make a star trail, then one on the
> moon should take 28/29 days to do one.. That would then make HC happy , and
> we are left only with the Aether to support our belief/
>
> But if a daily trail was observed, this would close our case, either because
> the stars did the moving, or because the moon did both a 23 hour spin, and
> translation, which means the same thing, a static earth and a rotating star
> system.
>
> More cause for wonder at why no stars are "allowed" on our lunar sourced
> pictures??? .. Yes guilty of "pauls paranoia" as charged..
>
> Philip.
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Jack Lewis
> To: geocentrism@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Sent: Friday, November 16, 2007 8:48 AM
> Subject: [geocentrism] Re: Two spin axes of Earth?
>
>
> Dear Philip,
> I don't advise swearing to God about anything especially that which aint!
>
> Now that is very interesting exercise, what would be observed from the moon
> in a geocentric model?
> Don't get involved in this one Regner, there are other more important
> points yet for you to consider.
>
> Jack
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: philip madsen
> To: geocentrism list
> Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2007 10:17 PM
> Subject: [geocentrism] Re: Two spin axes of Earth?
>
> SNIP
>
> Now there is a thought what star trail would you get if you had a camera
> on the north pole of the moon, doing its alleged 28 day spin.
>
> Philip
>
>
>
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG Free Edition.
> Version: 7.5.503 / Virus Database: 269.15.33/1132 - Release Date:
> 15/11/2007 9:34 AM
>
Other related posts:
