[geocentrism] Re: NASA
- From: "philip madsen" <pma15027@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <geocentrism@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 4 Aug 2007 10:30:53 +1000
Well Neville that was a very short and CONCISE list of all the reasons and
realities of our world today.. Nothing separates you and myself , except now
all that is left for you to discover is the true church of the true God. I
would add that this would be a most difficult task, given that the same forces
are pulling the strings of all of the visible religious institutions in the
world.
Might I suggest you come down and investigate the catacombs with me.. <
serious grin>
Philip.
PS By the way all, may I recommend a very good and interesting read published
in 1884, HISTORY OF ANTICHRIST. A very small book attached for the interested.
Though written by a Catholic Priest, it is more Scriptual, than anything else,
and compiles a dossier on the probable man of sin. It is amazingly prophetic
for our day. We must keep in mind it is only an opinion of interpretations, and
often where applicable contesting or conflicting views are put. His last word
are,
"It is by no means our intention or specify the time of events or fore runners
...of the worlds end, As the apostles were answered, Mat 24-36.. But of that
day and hour no one knoweth: no, not the angels of heaven, but the Father
alone. " he mentions the wise men, Eccles 3-22 "In many of Gods works be not
curious." I wonder if that includes geocentrism.. plm
----- Original Message -----
From: Neville Jones
To: geocentrism@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Saturday, August 04, 2007 4:17 AM
Subject: [geocentrism] Re: NASA
Some of us anti-PANs-in-the-making knew that the nutty Americans were talking
rubbish regarding their "Star Wars" laser defence system back in 1976, but
nobody listened to us, and besides many professors were on nice little earners
to write papers supporting it.
Now, if one does not need a focused laser spot, then one could fire an
extremely powerful laser at the Moon and hope to receive a trickle back again.
However, one would have no control over where it hit and would not require an
18-inches square laser reflector to be placed on the lunar surface. Normal
backscatter from the Moon would suffice.
So although I joke about NASA "shooting themselves in the foot" (pity it
wasn't the head), I have no doubt that the reflecting device concept is a red
herring in the Sea of Tranquility.
The other point is valid, though: Robert asks, "Why didn't the Russkies
scream in 1969 when the US claimed to land on the Moon?"
This used to trouble me and I have only recently realized the answer to it.
The "Russkies" and the Americans are actually nothing more than puppet
governments, whose strings are pulled by the same forces that pulled the
strings of Churchill, Roosevelt and Stalin in World War II. The same forces
that started WWII. The same forces that destroy economies at will via usury.
The same forces that start wars by deception and lies. The same forces that
control Disney and Hollywood. The same forces that make something for nothing
from their private banks (like the Fed and the Bank of England). The same
forces that control all of the major networks and media sources, including
newspapers, magazines, pornography and technical journals. The same forces that
murdered JFK.
"Intense engineering battle"? I don't think so. If so, why did NASA destroy
the plans for the Saturn V? Why did NASA destroy the plans for the Lunar Lander?
A: For the same reason that the scrap metal was immediately whisked away from
New York after 11 September 2001. For the same reason that no public enquiry is
being held into the so-called London Underground bombings. For the same reason
that there has STILL, after TEN YEARS, been no inquest into the death of
Princess Diana.
"In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act" -
George Orwell.
Neville.
-----Original Message-----
From: robert.bennett@xxxxxxx
Sent: Fri, 03 Aug 2007 13:17:26 -0400
To: geocentrism@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [geocentrism] Re: NASA
Dear All,
Since I agree with Neville and many others, not necessarily on this
forum, that the evidence against man having walked on the Moon is overwhelming,
I'm left with the problem of NASA's laser ranging experiments. According to
Robert NASA has shown, without shouting about it, that there isn't any
aberration between the outgoing and incoming light beam, thus reinforcing our
belief in geocentrism.
[Robert Bennett] Technically, aberration only refers to the returning beam
This being the case why would NASA invent a 'zero' result and fuelling
the geocentrism debate?
[Robert Bennett] Shooting themselves in the foot, as Neville says.
Also, why didn't the Russkies scream in 1969 when the US claimed to land
on the Moon?
In case anyone forgot, there was an intense engineering battle being
waged to be first to land on the Moon.
[Robert Bennett] Jack Lewis
www.classiccarartist.co.uk
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.5.476 / Virus Database: 269.11.2/933 - Release Date: 2/08/2007
2:22 PM
Other related posts:
