[geocentrism] Re: NASA
- From: "philip madsen" <joyphil@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <geocentrism@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 6 Aug 2007 10:00:18 +1000
5 months to clear the site = immediately whisked away ???
EXactly Have you seen what they do to parts of an aircrash for
investigation...
The steel the important steel was held under security, no one allowed to test
it. No reports of testing for explosives . It was not saved to be
investigated, but sold for scrap, as quickly as it was scavenged from the
site.. I'm sure you must have all the evidence of a false flag operation by
now.. else you are head down in the sand of denial...
I have another Catholic friend in the states, so indoctrinated, he still
believes there is a difference between the Dems and the Repubs, and refuses to
believe Israelie manned Computers manufactured in Russia count the vote in most
of the US electorates.. He refuses to believe that Bush and Clinton and Blair
have the same handshake..
Philip.
----- Original Message -----
From: Robert Bennett
To: geocentrism@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Monday, August 06, 2007 3:51 AM
Subject: [geocentrism] Re: NASA
From: Neville Jones
Some of us anti-PANs-in-the-making knew that the nutty Americans were
talking rubbish regarding their "Star Wars" laser defence system back in 1976,
but nobody listened to us, and besides many professors were on nice little
earners to write papers supporting it.
[Robert Bennett] I thought Reagan had completely lost reality when he
promoted the science fiction concept of laser defense agains ICBMs. But when
his 'Stars Wars' idea was budgeted bu Congress, this caused the collapse of the
USSR economically. They tried to compete with the US in both 'guns and butter'
by responding with their own laser defense in the MAD scenario, but were unable
to feed their people under their totalitarian system of complete gov eco
planning AND pay for the research. .
Like a high stakes poker game, Reagan had bluffed.... and won.
The Euros have a whole different spin, I'm sure.
Now, if one does not need a focused laser spot, then one could fire an
extremely powerful laser at the Moon and hope to receive a trickle back again.
However, one would have no control over where it hit and would not require an
18-inches square laser reflector to be placed on the lunar surface. Normal
backscatter from the Moon would suffice.
[Robert Bennett] Pls explain how the coherent laser beam would be
coherently reflected by the irregular lunar surface.
If not reflected coherently, the echo beam would just be part of the
lunar white noise ==> undetectable.
A: For the same reason that the scrap metal was immediately whisked away
from New York after 11 September 2001.
[Robert Bennett] Quite logical. Leave the bodies buried in the rubble
and as a memorial to 9/11, to show the terrorists that they could break our
will to rebuild and recover.
For the same reason in post war Germany and England the building debris
was left to this day in London and Dresden and Munich... The inner-city
buildings were left as rubble, never rebuilt.
5 months to clear the site = immediately whisked away ???
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.5.476 / Virus Database: 269.11.6/938 - Release Date: 5/08/2007
4:16 PM
Other related posts:
