Well Neville that was a very short and CONCISE list
of all the reasons and realities of our world today.. Nothing separates
you and myself , except now all that is left for you to discover is the true
church of the true God. I would add that this would be a most difficult task,
given that the same forces are pulling the
strings of all of the visible religious institutions in the world.
Might I suggest you come down and investigate the
catacombs with me.. < serious grin>
Philip.
PS By the way all, may I recommend a very
good and interesting read published in 1884, HISTORY OF ANTICHRIST. A very small
book attached for the interested.
Though written by a Catholic Priest, it is more
Scriptual, than anything else, and compiles a dossier on the probable man of
sin. It is amazingly prophetic for our day. We must keep in mind it is only an
opinion of interpretations, and often where applicable contesting or conflicting
views are put. His last word are,
"It is by no means our intention or specify the
time of events or fore runners ...of the worlds end, As the apostles were
answered, Mat 24-36.. But of that day and hour no one knoweth:
no, not the angels of heaven, but the Father alone. " he mentions the wise men, Eccles 3-22 "In many
of Gods works be not curious." I wonder if that includes
geocentrism.. plm
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Saturday, August 04, 2007 4:17
AM
Subject: [geocentrism] Re: NASA
Some of us anti-PANs-in-the-making knew that the nutty
Americans were talking rubbish regarding their "Star Wars" laser defence
system back in 1976, but nobody listened to us, and besides many professors
were on nice little earners to write papers supporting it.
Now, if one
does not need a focused laser spot, then one could fire an extremely powerful
laser at the Moon and hope to receive a trickle back again. However, one would
have no control over where it hit and would not require an 18-inches square
laser reflector to be placed on the lunar surface. Normal backscatter from the
Moon would suffice.
So although I joke about NASA "shooting themselves
in the foot" (pity it wasn't the head), I have no doubt that the reflecting
device concept is a red herring in the Sea of Tranquility.
The other
point is valid, though: Robert asks, "Why didn't the Russkies scream in 1969
when the US claimed to land on the Moon?"
This used to trouble me and I
have only recently realized the answer to it. The "Russkies" and the Americans
are actually nothing more than puppet governments, whose strings are pulled by
the same forces that pulled the strings of Churchill, Roosevelt and Stalin in
World War II. The same forces that started WWII. The same forces that destroy
economies at will via usury. The same forces that start wars by deception and
lies. The same forces that control Disney and Hollywood. The same forces that
make something for nothing from their private banks (like the Fed and the Bank
of England). The same forces that control all of the major networks and media
sources, including newspapers, magazines, pornography and technical journals.
The same forces that murdered JFK.
"Intense engineering battle"? I
don't think so. If so, why did NASA destroy the plans for the Saturn V? Why
did NASA destroy the plans for the Lunar Lander?
A: For the same reason
that the scrap metal was immediately whisked away from New York after 11
September 2001. For the same reason that no public enquiry is being held into
the so-called London Underground bombings. For the same reason that there has
STILL, after TEN YEARS, been no inquest into the
death of Princess Diana.
"In a time
of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act" - George
Orwell.
Neville.
-----Original Message-----
From:
robert.bennett@xxxxxxx
Sent: Fri, 03 Aug 2007 13:17:26
-0400
To: geocentrism@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject:
[geocentrism] Re: NASA
Dear All,
Since I agree with Neville and many others, not necessarily on this
forum, that the evidence against man having walked on the Moon is
overwhelming, I'm left with the problem of NASA's laser ranging
experiments. According to Robert NASA has shown, without shouting about
it, that there isn't any aberration between the outgoing and incoming
light beam, thus reinforcing our belief in geocentrism.
[Robert
Bennett] Technically, aberration only refers to the returning
beam
This being the case
why would NASA invent a 'zero' result and fuelling the geocentrism
debate?
[Robert Bennett] Shooting themselves in the
foot, as Neville says.
Also, why didn't the Russkies scream in 1969 when the US claimed
to land on the Moon?
In case anyone forgot, there was an intense engineering
battle being waged to be first to land on the Moon.
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Free
Edition.
Version: 7.5.476 / Virus Database: 269.11.2/933 - Release Date:
2/08/2007 2:22 PM
