[geocentrism] Re: Hello Regner
- From: Regner Trampedach <art@xxxxxxxxxx>
- To: geocentrism@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2007 03:43:45 +0200
Dear all,
Thanks for the welcome. I am starting a seperate thread with the
discussion of your theory of a geocentric universe.
Regards,
Regner Trampedach
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Quoting Bernie Brauer <bbrauer777@xxxxxxxxx>:
> Welcome Regner,
>
> Thank-you for agreeing to participate in The Geocentric Discussion Group
> of Neville T. Jones Ph.D. I know that you are not a part
> of the "Geocentric Truth Movement", are a critic of such and are here as an
>
> "expert" representing and supporting the heliocentric world-view, and to
> prove the "incorrectness" of Geocentrism.
>
> My view is that you will find the other experts of true science and
> Geocentrism
> that are members of this discussion group to be very intelligent and
> knowledgeable
> people, and you may later find out that, "I wasn't expecting this high
> level
> of a challenge to my heliocentric viewpoints."
>
> I think I had originally sent out a two page introductory email with some
> core
> comments about Geocentrism from Marshall Hall and Neville Jones,
> or at least you were directed to the websites with their links.
>
> Now as far as Geocentrists are concerned all the major pieces of evidence
> indicate a non-rotating, non-orbiting, stationary Earth at the centre of
> the universe
> with the sun doing the moving not the Earth. The sun orbits the Earth
> daily
> and also has a yearly oscillating or spiral movement, that takes it from
> the Tropic of Cancer in the north on a six month journey to the Tropic of
> Capricorn in the south where the
> sun supernaturally reverses tracks and heads on new six month journey
> northwards.
>
> The Geocentric viewpoint can explain everything we see about the Earth
> System
> based on real science and facts, and the heliocentric viewpoint tries to do
> this also
> but the "science" is built not on facts but theories and assumptions that
> are adopted out of thin air to form a foundation for this cosmological
> structure.
>
> On a sunny calm summer day I can look up and see with my own eyes that
> the sun is moving, and also at the same time I do not feel any Earth
> movement.
> I do not feel any rumblings from an Earth supposedly orbiting the sun at
> 67,000 miles per hour. And I see and feel a perfectly calm gas or
> atmosphere that
> should be greatly disturbed if the Earth were to have the heliocentric
> speeds.
>
> So to try and start this discussion off with Regner could you please pose
> a question or criticism about a Geocentric point that you are sure is
> faulty
> or incorrect, or maybe a heliocentric point that you
> feel is indisputable, or some other way that you feel is best to get this
> debate going?
>
> Kind Regards,
> Bernie Brauer
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------
> Don't let your dream ride pass you by. Make it a reality with Yahoo!
> Autos.
Other related posts:
