[geocentrism] Re: Heliocentrism is dead

  • From: Steven Jones <steven@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: geocentrism@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2007 23:25:40 +0000

Regner Trampedach wrote:
Don't worry, Jack - there wasn't any.
  
According to you, yes, but that is what we're here for, to prove one way or another. Right now heliocentrism is under-siege and so far you've been unable to defend the crumbling hypothesis.

Steven.
    Regards,

       Regner

Quoting Jack Lewis <jack.lewis@xxxxxxxxxxxx>:

  
Dear Allen,
What was the clinch - I think I missed it!

Jack
  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Allen Daves 
  To: geocentrism@xxxxxxxxxxxxx 
  Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2007 7:15 PM
  Subject: [geocentrism] Re: Heliocentrism is dead


  It means Game point ...we win...:-)

  HC is scientificaly untenable.....

  It means Paul & Regner have converted to GC.....ok well ............we are
still waiting for that......:-o

  Jack Lewis <jack.lewis@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
    Dear Steven,
    What does this posting mean?

    Jack

    

  

Other related posts: