[geocentrism] Re: Heliocentrism is dead

  • From: Allen Daves <allendaves@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: geocentrism@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2007 15:37:49 -0800 (PST)

Defend it?...there is nothing to deffend...Regner's mind is not allowing him to 
see the obvious 1.Paul's own diagram that he praised disproves HC 
  2. According to Regner ther is no rotation around the sun and yet the 
conditon HC descibes for the earth is the defintion he gives for Rotation..?
   
  Regner has far bigger problems then defending HC...He can't even see his own 
termonolgy and  inconsistencies......Wake up ............. IT IS DEAD! ...
   
  And the truth shall set you feeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee......time for 
some of the noble mindset you talked about earlier Regner.........Irrifutable 
proof...Regener can't bring himself to this...Like i said......

Steven Jones <steven@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
  Regner Trampedach wrote:   
Don't worry, Jack - there wasn't any.    
According to you, yes, but that is what we're here for, to prove one way or 
another. Right now heliocentrism is under-siege and so far you've been unable 
to defend the crumbling hypothesis.

Steven.
  
    Regards,           Regner    Quoting Jack Lewis <jack.lewis@xxxxxxxxxxxx>:  
    
  
Dear Allen,  What was the clinch - I think I missed it!    Jack    ----- 
Original Message -----     From: Allen Daves     To: geocentrism@xxxxxxxxxxxxx  
   Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2007 7:15 PM    Subject: [geocentrism] Re: 
Heliocentrism is dead        It means Game point ...we win...:-)      HC is 
scientificaly untenable.....      It means Paul & Regner have converted to 
GC.....ok well ............we are  still waiting for that......:-o      Jack 
Lewis <jack.lewis@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:      Dear Steven,      What does this 
posting mean?        Jack        

      


Other related posts: