[geocentrism] Re: Heliocentrism is dead
- From: "philip madsen" <pma15027@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <geocentrism@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 16 Nov 2007 11:01:12 +1000
That an opinion I am not in agreement with.. It seems to be the other way round
so far. You all should tak an aptitude test for mechanics. both sides of
course.
Philip.
----- Original Message -----
From: Steven Jones
To: geocentrism@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Friday, November 16, 2007 9:25 AM
Subject: [geocentrism] Re: Heliocentrism is dead
Regner Trampedach wrote:
Don't worry, Jack - there wasn't any.
According to you, yes, but that is what we're here for, to prove one way or
another. Right now heliocentrism is under-siege and so far you've been unable
to defend the crumbling hypothesis.
Steven.
Regards,
Regner
Quoting Jack Lewis <jack.lewis@xxxxxxxxxxxx>:
Dear Allen,
What was the clinch - I think I missed it!
Jack
----- Original Message -----
From: Allen Daves
To: geocentrism@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2007 7:15 PM
Subject: [geocentrism] Re: Heliocentrism is dead
It means Game point ...we win...:-)
HC is scientificaly untenable.....
It means Paul & Regner have converted to GC.....ok well ............we are
still waiting for that......:-o
Jack Lewis <jack.lewis@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Dear Steven,
What does this posting mean?
Jack
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.5.503 / Virus Database: 269.15.33/1132 - Release Date: 15/11/2007
9:34 AM
Other related posts:
