[geocentrism] Re: Challenge to Regner
- From: Sungenis@xxxxxxx
- To: geocentrism@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2007 13:03:41 EDT
In a message dated 10/28/2007 8:14:57 P.M. Eastern Standard Time,
art@xxxxxxxxxx writes:
Dear Robert Sungenis,
Thanks for your reply. I don't mean to dodge your question, but I don't
see a reason not to have your question being part of the "5 points" either.
If you agree.
R. Sungenis: Regner, ok, you win. I will give you four more challenges. I'm
out of town now, so I won't be able to address this until later.
I'll add:
"Relativity does not explain observed drift in Michelson-Morley (and later)
experiments."
Please correct me, if that interpretation is wrong. I have no intentions of
distorting your point. And I would be most happy to receive those four other
points you have in store.
R. Sungenis: The quote from Einstein that I gave you explained the
difficulties Relativity would have with M/M. If you remember, Einstein said:
"If M/M
is wrong, Relativity is wrong." This was predicated on the fact that Einstein
understood M/M as not showing an ether drift. But according to Einstein, if
M/M does show an ether drift, then Relativity is wrong. Use that in light of
the data I gave you about the M/M ether drift.
Your question is only one of many that "...gets right to the heart of the
matter.". I will reply to your point, just as I will reply to the other
points made.
Regards,
Regner Trampedach
R. Sungenis: No problem. Five challenges you will have.
************************************** See what's new at http://www.aol.com
Other related posts:
