[geocentrism] Re: Challenge to Regner
- From: Regner Trampedach <art@xxxxxxxxxx>
- To: geocentrism@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2007 02:14:34 +0100
Dear Robert Sungenis,
Thanks for your reply. I don't mean to dodge your question, but I don't
see a reason not to have your question being part of the "5 points" either.
If you agree. I'll add:
"Relativity does not explain observed drift in Michelson-Morley (and later)
experiments."
Please correct me, if that interpretation is wrong. I have no intentions of
distorting your point. And I would be most happy to receive those four other
points you have in store.
Your question is only one of many that "...gets right to the heart of the
matter.". I will reply to your point, just as I will reply to the other
points made.
Regards,
Regner Trampedach
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Quoting sungenis@xxxxxxx:
>
> Regner,
>
>
>
> First of all, I did not question your scientific abilities, so you can rest
> easy. I just want you to answer the question honestly and scientifically.?
>
>
>
> Second, I think I speak for the other members on this forum, which is to say
> that they would be most appreciative if you would answer the question I
> posed. Many of them wrote back to me and applauded the question as speaking
> for them. They are all familiar with the nature of the question, since most
> are familiar with the Michelson-Morley experiment and its repeats.
>
>
>
> The question is of the utmost importance because it gets right to the heart
> of the matter. It will show us whether you can meet the challenge set before
> you. If you can't answer it and do so satisfactorily, then there is no reason
> to add four other challenges (although I have four other challenges
> available).
>
>
>
> Third, this is now the second time you have rebuffed me. The first was in
> refusing to read the book Galileo Was Wrong. Now you are telling me you don't
> want to answer the one question that I posed to you, rather than burdening
> you with five at once.
>
>
>
> I think it's time to meet the challenge, Regner. So far, in all your posts,
> I've seen a lot of complaining and superfluous dialogue, but?I haven't seen
> you deal with the heart of the issue.
>
> I'll wait for your reply.
>
> Robert Sungenis
>
>
>
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Regner Trampedach <art@xxxxxxxxxx>
> To: geocentrism@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Sent: Thu, 25 Oct 2007 10:51 pm
> Subject: [geocentrism] Re: Challenge to Regner
>
>
>
>
> Robert Sungenis,
>
> I did recieve your E-mail, and I'm sorry I haven't replied before.
> I would much appreciate if we could just follow my original plan, and
> not have all these side discussions - I believe that would make it much
> easier for all parties concerned. Because of all these side discussions,
> I now have more than 200 mails in my geocentric folder, but only 9(!)
> entries for my challenge to this forum. I believe that I have already
> proven that I have taken up the challenge to show some fallacies of your
> geocentric belief, by answering all these posts. I have yet to get to
> the stage of showing these fallacies, but it is (some of) you guys,
> that are slowing down the process.
> If you mean to challenge my credentials as a scientist, then I believe
> the University of Aarhus, Denmark, Michigan State University, USA, and
> the Australian National University have all done a more thorough job
> than you'll be able to do.
> Could you please just distill the 5 points from those books, that in
> the strongest and most fundamental way supports a geo-centric Solar system.
>
> Regards,
>
> Regner Trampedach
>
> - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
> -
>
>
> Quoting sungenis@xxxxxxx:
>
> > Regner,
> >
> > A few days ago I sent you the first of five challenges that you requested
> in
> > lieu of receiving our book, Galileo Was Wrong.?I hope you received it. If
> > not, please let me know and I will send it again. It concerned the
> > Michelson-Morely, Sagnac and other such experiments.
> >
> > In the last few days I've seen you communicate with other people on the
> > forum, which thus caused me to wonder if you received my first challenge.
> >
> > Please let me know at your earliest convenience.
> >
> > Robert Sungenis
> >
> >
> >
> > ________________________________________________________________________
> > Email and AIM finally together. You've gotta check out free AOL Mail! -
> > http://mail.aol.com
> >
>
>
>
> ________________________________________________________________________
> Email and AIM finally together. You've gotta check out free AOL Mail! -
> http://mail.aol.com
>
Other related posts:
