[geocentrism] Re: Challenge to Regner
- From: sungenis@xxxxxxx
- To: geocentrism@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2007 09:47:06 -0400
Regner,
First of all, I did not question your scientific abilities, so you can rest
easy. I just want you to answer the question honestly and scientifically.?
Second, I think I speak for the other members on this forum, which is to say
that they would be most appreciative if you would answer the question I posed.
Many of them wrote back to me and applauded the question as speaking for them.
They are all familiar with the nature of the question, since most are familiar
with the Michelson-Morley experiment and its repeats.
The question is of the utmost importance because it gets right to the heart of
the matter. It will show us whether you can meet the challenge set before you.
If you can't answer it and do so satisfactorily, then there is no reason to add
four other challenges (although I have four other challenges available).
Third, this is now the second time you have rebuffed me. The first was in
refusing to read the book Galileo Was Wrong. Now you are telling me you don't
want to answer the one question that I posed to you, rather than burdening you
with five at once.
I think it's time to meet the challenge, Regner. So far, in all your posts,
I've seen a lot of complaining and superfluous dialogue, but?I haven't seen you
deal with the heart of the issue.
I'll wait for your reply.
Robert Sungenis
-----Original Message-----
From: Regner Trampedach <art@xxxxxxxxxx>
To: geocentrism@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Thu, 25 Oct 2007 10:51 pm
Subject: [geocentrism] Re: Challenge to Regner
Robert Sungenis,
I did recieve your E-mail, and I'm sorry I haven't replied before.
I would much appreciate if we could just follow my original plan, and
not have all these side discussions - I believe that would make it much
easier for all parties concerned. Because of all these side discussions,
I now have more than 200 mails in my geocentric folder, but only 9(!)
entries for my challenge to this forum. I believe that I have already
proven that I have taken up the challenge to show some fallacies of your
geocentric belief, by answering all these posts. I have yet to get to
the stage of showing these fallacies, but it is (some of) you guys,
that are slowing down the process.
If you mean to challenge my credentials as a scientist, then I believe
the University of Aarhus, Denmark, Michigan State University, USA, and
the Australian National University have all done a more thorough job
than you'll be able to do.
Could you please just distill the 5 points from those books, that in
the strongest and most fundamental way supports a geo-centric Solar system.
Regards,
Regner Trampedach
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Quoting sungenis@xxxxxxx:
> Regner,
>
> A few days ago I sent you the first of five challenges that you requested in
> lieu of receiving our book, Galileo Was Wrong.?I hope you received it. If
> not, please let me know and I will send it again. It concerned the
> Michelson-Morely, Sagnac and other such experiments.
>
> In the last few days I've seen you communicate with other people on the
> forum, which thus caused me to wonder if you received my first challenge.
>
> Please let me know at your earliest convenience.
>
> Robert Sungenis
>
>
>
> ________________________________________________________________________
> Email and AIM finally together. You've gotta check out free AOL Mail! -
> http://mail.aol.com
>
________________________________________________________________________
Email and AIM finally together. You've gotta check out free AOL Mail! -
http://mail.aol.com
Other related posts:
