[GeoStL] Re: Saint charles county issues

  • From: "TKLNHL" <sydstyr@xxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: <geocaching@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Tue, 7 Oct 2003 09:23:35 -0500

First off, just because I've only been doing this goecache thing for 4 months 
or so and am solidly stuck at 45 caches -- DOESN'T mean I don't have an opinion 
 LOL.

My first thought is -- what's wrong with a few rules? Everyone admits that this 
sport is in it's infancy. OK. So, why NOT establish guidelines now and set few 
protocols BEFORE 5000 people start placing caches, opening new websites and ALL 
parks look like some public land at deer season. 

Ok.. so ONE person had a chat with someone and wound up opening up the can of 
worms. Well, it's open so hopefully it can be dealt with and a set of rules can 
be put in place. It's going to happen. As a matter of fact *we* (meaning my 
husband and I) almost did it to SLAGA at a  family function.

Turns out an not-so-often seen cousin is the manger of one of the St. Louis 
County Parks. His current park as a two part cache in it.  He had been manager 
at apark near our home that has no caches in it. I was asking him about cache 
placement and he had NO CLUE what I was talking about. NONE. At ALL.  OH CR^P.  
He was fairly put-out that something "like this" was going on in "his park" and 
he knew nothing about it.  This is a man who has been in the Park system for at 
least 20 years and here "we" knew something about "his" park that he did not 
know. I can't say he was happy about this. 

What I did was to contact a couple of people here OFF-LIST to clarify for my 
own understanding what the St. Louis County Park regulations are and more 
importantly -- how they work! I did give the cousin the geostl and geocaching 
websites.  We (my husband and I) were supposed to email him information about 
how *we* thought cache placement in parks worked based on the geostl website so 
that he could follow up on it.   After some discussion at home and a couple of 
off-list emails we let it drop as far as the cosuin is concerned. We felt that 
this is the kind of person who might just raise a high enough stink that St. 
Louis County Parks would show up on the radar as an "issue." And, as newcomers 
we certainly did not want to be "the ones".

So. I HAVE a point: Eventually it's going to happen. SOmeone, somehow will put 
geocaching out there and someone WILL notice and suddenly wonder, "Is it really 
a good idea to ahve people wandering through the woods in our parks?" Heck, WE 
have had that thought a couple of times ourselves wandering through the woods 
of some parks. The thing is, as more people become invovled and are less into 
the understanding of geocaching, it's quite possible that they will have a 
false sense of security and will believe that EVERY placed cache IS sanctioned 
by the area it's placed in. Why not be willing to fill out a piece of paper to 
cover your OWN butt? That's how Iook at it. It can also be a sense (if false) 
of security for the cache placer to know, for sure, that it is OK to do this. 

Part of the cache placement log includes a bold red statement: In addition, if 
you need to ask permission to place a cache in this area, I am trusting you 
have already done so. What will happen the first time someone DOES ask 
permission and, like we did, find out that the people supposedly in charge are 
in the dark?  What if that peson has the power to make things unfavorable? 

I hate to see hard feelings, even between people I don't know.  So now St. 
Charles County Parks has, for whatever reason, become "an issue".  Perhaps the 
best thing now would be for everyone involved deal with it off-list, with 
updates to list, until it's been resolved. I admire openess, but also think 
that being too open can do more harm than good in a young organization such as 
this. You simply cannot please everyone. I'm not promoting a coverup, this 
isn't Arnold on a movie set, but at times it might be best to work behind the 
scenes, do some editing an dthen come out with the final production.

Good luck to everyone in in seeing this through to a positive and beneficial 
end. 

Nancy

I'll go back to homeschooling my kid now .. 

Other related posts: