First off, just because I've only been doing this goecache thing for 4 months or so and am solidly stuck at 45 caches -- DOESN'T mean I don't have an opinion LOL. My first thought is -- what's wrong with a few rules? Everyone admits that this sport is in it's infancy. OK. So, why NOT establish guidelines now and set few protocols BEFORE 5000 people start placing caches, opening new websites and ALL parks look like some public land at deer season. Ok.. so ONE person had a chat with someone and wound up opening up the can of worms. Well, it's open so hopefully it can be dealt with and a set of rules can be put in place. It's going to happen. As a matter of fact *we* (meaning my husband and I) almost did it to SLAGA at a family function. Turns out an not-so-often seen cousin is the manger of one of the St. Louis County Parks. His current park as a two part cache in it. He had been manager at apark near our home that has no caches in it. I was asking him about cache placement and he had NO CLUE what I was talking about. NONE. At ALL. OH CR^P. He was fairly put-out that something "like this" was going on in "his park" and he knew nothing about it. This is a man who has been in the Park system for at least 20 years and here "we" knew something about "his" park that he did not know. I can't say he was happy about this. What I did was to contact a couple of people here OFF-LIST to clarify for my own understanding what the St. Louis County Park regulations are and more importantly -- how they work! I did give the cousin the geostl and geocaching websites. We (my husband and I) were supposed to email him information about how *we* thought cache placement in parks worked based on the geostl website so that he could follow up on it. After some discussion at home and a couple of off-list emails we let it drop as far as the cosuin is concerned. We felt that this is the kind of person who might just raise a high enough stink that St. Louis County Parks would show up on the radar as an "issue." And, as newcomers we certainly did not want to be "the ones". So. I HAVE a point: Eventually it's going to happen. SOmeone, somehow will put geocaching out there and someone WILL notice and suddenly wonder, "Is it really a good idea to ahve people wandering through the woods in our parks?" Heck, WE have had that thought a couple of times ourselves wandering through the woods of some parks. The thing is, as more people become invovled and are less into the understanding of geocaching, it's quite possible that they will have a false sense of security and will believe that EVERY placed cache IS sanctioned by the area it's placed in. Why not be willing to fill out a piece of paper to cover your OWN butt? That's how Iook at it. It can also be a sense (if false) of security for the cache placer to know, for sure, that it is OK to do this. Part of the cache placement log includes a bold red statement: In addition, if you need to ask permission to place a cache in this area, I am trusting you have already done so. What will happen the first time someone DOES ask permission and, like we did, find out that the people supposedly in charge are in the dark? What if that peson has the power to make things unfavorable? I hate to see hard feelings, even between people I don't know. So now St. Charles County Parks has, for whatever reason, become "an issue". Perhaps the best thing now would be for everyone involved deal with it off-list, with updates to list, until it's been resolved. I admire openess, but also think that being too open can do more harm than good in a young organization such as this. You simply cannot please everyone. I'm not promoting a coverup, this isn't Arnold on a movie set, but at times it might be best to work behind the scenes, do some editing an dthen come out with the final production. Good luck to everyone in in seeing this through to a positive and beneficial end. Nancy I'll go back to homeschooling my kid now ..