Re: [foxboro] Sanity check on Go Global
- From: stan <stanb@xxxxxxxx>
- To: foxboro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Mon, 17 Feb 2003 15:38:45 -0500
On Mon, Feb 17, 2003 at 03:20:03PM -0500, Johnson, Alex (Foxboro) wrote:
>
> GoGlobal is much faster. We sell it as part of our dialup solution -
> FoxRemote Configurations 1, 2, and 3.
>
> Hummingbird's eXceed works over dialup, but with FV you see significant
> performance hit relative to GoGlobal on a phone line.
>
Thanks for the fast reply.
Yes, if my assumptions are correct, I can easily see that would be the case
the X protocol is well known to not work on low bandwidth connections. As a
matter of fact I deployed many many years ago, a solution to provide
dialup access to a X based control system using some software (from the
makers of PC/FTP if memory serves).
Given a fast network, is there any advantage of using Go Global?
Also, could you comment on my assumptions?
--
"They that would give up essential liberty for temporary safety deserve
neither liberty nor safety."
-- Benjamin Franklin
_______________________________________________________________________
This mailing list is neither sponsored nor endorsed by Invensys Process
Systems (formerly The Foxboro Company). Use the info you obtain here at
your own risks. Read http://www.thecassandraproject.org/disclaimer.html
foxboro mailing list: //www.freelists.org/list/foxboro
to subscribe: mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=join
to unsubscribe: mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=leave
Other related posts:
