Re: [foxboro] Reduce IFL's for FBM

  • From: "Wingard, Robert S." <BobWingard@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: "foxboro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx" <foxboro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Tue, 17 May 2005 11:48:35 -0500

Refiner plate position control is exactly the application I had in mind for
the reasons stated. The ladder editor is much better in IACC, we are still
playing around with IACC because I do not have the nerve to change yet, but
it appears that it may become useful in the near future.

Bob Wingard

-----Original Message-----
From: William C. Ricker [mailto:wcricker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Monday, May 16, 2005 5:54 PM
To: foxboro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [foxboro] Reduce IFL's for FBM


>PLB block are also good for processing local operations at a panel. The
>processing speed (300 instructions in 30ms) eliminates any perceived delay
>by an operator when operating equipment locally.

Likewise it is quite usefull when having the DCS control devices it is
otherwise not fast enough to effectively control, refiner plate movement
in a paper mill,for example.

Lots of maintanance folks still like the ladders; they understand them right
out of the box.  Relative isolation of a PLC FBM improves reliability and
reduces likelyhood of errors elsewhere impacting that control device.  This
thing certainly has it's place in a DCS.

I would argue for improved communications and configuration twixt FBM and CP
and some ladder function improvements. Such add number transfers and limited
numeric PLB functions.  Such as a somewhat more slick ladder editor.  They
never integrated very well with FoxCAE.  Is there integration with IACC?
Can I "can" a motor controller which includes HMI, Block and PLB functions
and drop multiple instances into an IA system data base?  Would be nice.

Regards,

William C. Ricker
FeedForward, Inc.
Marietta, GA  USA
770.426.4422
wcricker @ feedforward.com


=20
=20
_______________________________________________________________________
This mailing list is neither sponsored nor endorsed by Invensys Process
Systems (formerly The Foxboro Company). Use the info you obtain here at
your own risks. Read http://www.thecassandraproject.org/disclaimer.html
=20
foxboro mailing list:             //www.freelists.org/list/foxboro
to subscribe:         mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=3Djoin
to unsubscribe:      mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=3Dleave
=20
=0D

**********    Confidentiality Notice    **********
This electronic transmission and any attached documents or other
writings are confidential and are for the sole use of the intended
recipient(s) identified above. This message may contain information
that is privileged, confidential or otherwise protected from disclosure
under applicable law. If the receiver of this information is not the
intended recipient, or the employee, or agent responsible for delivering
the information to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that
any use, reading, dissemination, distribution, copying or storage of this
information is strictly prohibited. If you have received this information in
error, please notify the sender by return email and delete the electronic
transmission, including all attachments from your system.
 
 
_______________________________________________________________________
This mailing list is neither sponsored nor endorsed by Invensys Process
Systems (formerly The Foxboro Company). Use the info you obtain here at
your own risks. Read http://www.thecassandraproject.org/disclaimer.html
 
foxboro mailing list:             //www.freelists.org/list/foxboro
to subscribe:         mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=join
to unsubscribe:      mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=leave
 

Other related posts: