Re: [foxboro] One more question...
- From: "Brazell, Troy L Jr" <TLBrazell@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <foxboro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 4 Jan 2007 13:11:39 -0500
Question .....
Can two databases co-exist within the IACC?
In other words can the CP's have there own database?
Thanks
Troy
**************************
Troy Brazell
DCP Midstream
ISA CCST
Sr. Process Control Analyst
Office 405-263-4130
Cell 405-301-2994
tlbrazell@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
**************************
-----Original Message-----
From: foxboro-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:foxboro-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of Johnson, Alex P (IPS)
Sent: Thursday, January 04, 2007 11:53 AM
To: foxboro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [foxboro] One more question...
As in all decisions, there are trade-offs.
IEE supports only V8.2 and later and only equipment that was preferred
in that release (so not 100-Series I/O). It also lacks FV integration
which can be a big time saver for new projects.
IACC supports from V6.4 and later and all station types. It has FV
integration.
Both IEE and IACC have similar configuration tool sets though IEE is
much better looking.
If the project is grassroots new, IEE is the better control
configuration tool.
If the project has any older equipment or could benefit from FV
integration, IACC is the better choice.
Does that help?
(I really should learn to avoid short answers. :))
Regards,
=3D20
Alex Johnson
Invensys Systems, Inc.
10900 Equity Drive
Houston, TX 77041
713.329.8472 (voice)
713.329.1700 (fax)
713.329.1600 (switchboard)
alex.johnson@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
-----Original Message-----
From: foxboro-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:foxboro-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of Jeremy Milum
Sent: Thursday, January 04, 2007 10:14 AM
To: foxboro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [foxboro] One more question...
On 1/4/07, Johnson, Alex P (IPS) <alex.johnson@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> I strongly recommend that you get and use IACC. This configurator is
> much more modern than the much, much older ICC. It supports graphic
loop
> templates and integration with FoxView among other features.
IACC and not IEE?
=3D20
=3D20
_______________________________________________________________________
This mailing list is neither sponsored nor endorsed by Invensys Process
Systems (formerly The Foxboro Company). Use the info you obtain here at
your own risks. Read http://www.thecassandraproject.org/disclaimer.html
=3D20
foxboro mailing list: //www.freelists.org/list/foxboro
to subscribe:
mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=3D3Djoin
to unsubscribe:
mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=3D3Dleave
=3D20
Confidentiality Notice: =3D0AThe information contained in this =
electronic
m=3D
essage and any attachment(s) to this message are intended for the
exclusi=3D
ve use of the recipient(s) and may contain confidential, privileged or
pr=3D
oprietary information. If you are not the intended recipient, please
noti=3D
fy the sender immediately, delete all copies of this message and any
atta=3D
chment(s). Any other use of the E-Mail by you is prohibited.=3D0A
=20
=20
_______________________________________________________________________
This mailing list is neither sponsored nor endorsed by Invensys Process
Systems (formerly The Foxboro Company). Use the info you obtain here at
your own risks. Read http://www.thecassandraproject.org/disclaimer.html
=20
foxboro mailing list: //www.freelists.org/list/foxboro
to subscribe: =
mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=3Djoin
to unsubscribe: =
mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=3Dleave
=20
_______________________________________________________________________
This mailing list is neither sponsored nor endorsed by Invensys Process
Systems (formerly The Foxboro Company). Use the info you obtain here at
your own risks. Read http://www.thecassandraproject.org/disclaimer.html
foxboro mailing list: //www.freelists.org/list/foxboro
to subscribe: mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=join
to unsubscribe: mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=leave
Other related posts:
