Re: CP1 for plant 1 and CP2 for plant 2 That's fine. The advantage of combining CPs in the same database under IACC is that peer-to-peer connections are pick and place rather than type. In your case, that is probably not much of an issue so I'd put them in different IACC databases. Regards, =20 Alex Johnson Invensys Systems, Inc. 10900 Equity Drive Houston, TX 77041 713.329.8472 (voice) 713.329.1700 (fax) 713.329.1600 (switchboard) alex.johnson@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx -----Original Message----- From: foxboro-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:foxboro-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Brazell, Troy L Jr Sent: Thursday, January 04, 2007 2:07 PM To: foxboro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: Re: [foxboro] One more question... As usual I failed to make my self clear Alex. What I hope to have on a proposed project is two CP270's. The Plant is basically two plants inside one fence. If I can split the databases by Plants and CPs i.e. CP1 for plant 1 and CP2 for plant 2 it will allow two users to do configurations at the same time. Is this correct or is there a better way? Be gentle now as I have swallowed my pride and moved to windoze! ;-) Even though I will always love UNIX. Thanks Troy ************************** Troy Brazell DCP Midstream ISA CCST Sr. Process Control Analyst Office 405-263-4130 Cell 405-301-2994 tlbrazell@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx ************************** -----Original Message----- From: foxboro-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:foxboro-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Johnson, Alex P (IPS) Sent: Thursday, January 04, 2007 1:43 PM To: foxboro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: Re: [foxboro] One more question... In IACC, a database may hold one or more CP database. IACC is an ICC replacement. It exceeds the ICC in every respect including the size of the database. It's most commonly perceived limitations are: 1) Its database architecture supports only 12,000 objects in a database (about 3 CPs maximum) 2) Only one person may edit a database at a time. Relative to the ICC, #2 is no different especially if the database is limited to one CP as you suggest. Thus, IACC is a very good ICC replacement though by no means is it the ultimate configuration tool. We hope that IEE will grow to be as great an improvement over IACC as IACC is over the ICC. Note: FoxCAE users like their tool combined with ICC, but it has reached a mature state and does not handle some of the new features, e.g., FF device configuration. Make sense? Regards, =3D3D20 Alex Johnson Invensys Systems, Inc. 10900 Equity Drive Houston, TX 77041 713.329.8472 (voice) 713.329.1700 (fax) 713.329.1600 (switchboard) alex.johnson@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx -----Original Message----- From: foxboro-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:foxboro-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Brazell, Troy L Jr Sent: Thursday, January 04, 2007 12:12 PM To: foxboro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: Re: [foxboro] One more question... Question ..... Can two databases co-exist within the IACC? In other words can the CP's have there own database? Thanks Troy ************************** Troy Brazell DCP Midstream ISA CCST Sr. Process Control Analyst Office 405-263-4130 Cell 405-301-2994 tlbrazell@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx ************************** -----Original Message----- From: foxboro-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:foxboro-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Johnson, Alex P (IPS) Sent: Thursday, January 04, 2007 11:53 AM To: foxboro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: Re: [foxboro] One more question... As in all decisions, there are trade-offs. IEE supports only V8.2 and later and only equipment that was preferred in that release (so not 100-Series I/O). It also lacks FV integration which can be a big time saver for new projects. IACC supports from V6.4 and later and all station types. It has FV integration. Both IEE and IACC have similar configuration tool sets though IEE is much better looking. If the project is grassroots new, IEE is the better control configuration tool. If the project has any older equipment or could benefit from FV integration, IACC is the better choice. Does that help? (I really should learn to avoid short answers. :)) Regards, =3D3D3D3D20 Alex Johnson Invensys Systems, Inc. 10900 Equity Drive Houston, TX 77041 713.329.8472 (voice) 713.329.1700 (fax) 713.329.1600 (switchboard) alex.johnson@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx -----Original Message----- From: foxboro-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:foxboro-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Jeremy Milum Sent: Thursday, January 04, 2007 10:14 AM To: foxboro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: Re: [foxboro] One more question... On 1/4/07, Johnson, Alex P (IPS) <alex.johnson@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > I strongly recommend that you get and use IACC. This configurator is > much more modern than the much, much older ICC. It supports graphic loop > templates and integration with FoxView among other features. IACC and not IEE? =3D3D3D3D20 =3D3D3D3D20 _______________________________________________________________________ This mailing list is neither sponsored nor endorsed by Invensys Process Systems (formerly The Foxboro Company). Use the info you obtain here at your own risks. Read http://www.thecassandraproject.org/disclaimer.html =3D3D3D3D20 foxboro mailing list: //www.freelists.org/list/foxboro to subscribe: mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=3D3D3D3D3Djoin to unsubscribe: mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=3D3D3D3D3Dleave =3D3D3D3D20 Confidentiality Notice: =3D3D3D3D0AThe information contained in this =3D3= D3D electronic m=3D3D3D3D essage and any attachment(s) to this message are intended for the exclusi=3D3D3D3D ve use of the recipient(s) and may contain confidential, privileged or pr=3D3D3D3D oprietary information. If you are not the intended recipient, please noti=3D3D3D3D fy the sender immediately, delete all copies of this message and any atta=3D3D3D3D chment(s). Any other use of the E-Mail by you is prohibited.=3D3D3D3D0A =3D3D3D20 =3D3D3D20 _______________________________________________________________________ This mailing list is neither sponsored nor endorsed by Invensys Process Systems (formerly The Foxboro Company). Use the info you obtain here at your own risks. Read http://www.thecassandraproject.org/disclaimer.html =3D3D3D20 foxboro mailing list: //www.freelists.org/list/foxboro to subscribe: =3D3D3D mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=3D3D3D3Djoin to unsubscribe: =3D3D3D mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=3D3D3D3Dleave =3D3D3D20 =3D3D20 =3D3D20 _______________________________________________________________________ This mailing list is neither sponsored nor endorsed by Invensys Process Systems (formerly The Foxboro Company). Use the info you obtain here at your own risks. Read http://www.thecassandraproject.org/disclaimer.html =3D3D20 foxboro mailing list: //www.freelists.org/list/foxboro to subscribe: mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=3D3D3Djoin to unsubscribe: mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=3D3D3Dleave =3D3D20 Confidentiality Notice: =3D3D0AThe information contained in this =3D electronic m=3D3D essage and any attachment(s) to this message are intended for the exclusi=3D3D ve use of the recipient(s) and may contain confidential, privileged or pr=3D3D oprietary information. If you are not the intended recipient, please noti=3D3D fy the sender immediately, delete all copies of this message and any atta=3D3D chment(s). Any other use of the E-Mail by you is prohibited.=3D3D0A =3D20 =3D20 _______________________________________________________________________ This mailing list is neither sponsored nor endorsed by Invensys Process Systems (formerly The Foxboro Company). Use the info you obtain here at your own risks. Read http://www.thecassandraproject.org/disclaimer.html =3D20 foxboro mailing list: //www.freelists.org/list/foxboro to subscribe: =3D mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=3D3Djoin to unsubscribe: =3D mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=3D3Dleave =3D20 =20 =20 _______________________________________________________________________ This mailing list is neither sponsored nor endorsed by Invensys Process Systems (formerly The Foxboro Company). Use the info you obtain here at your own risks. Read http://www.thecassandraproject.org/disclaimer.html =20 foxboro mailing list: //www.freelists.org/list/foxboro to subscribe: mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=3Djoin to unsubscribe: mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=3Dleave =20 Confidentiality Notice: =0AThe information contained in this electronic m= essage and any attachment(s) to this message are intended for the exclusi= ve use of the recipient(s) and may contain confidential, privileged or pr= oprietary information. If you are not the intended recipient, please noti= fy the sender immediately, delete all copies of this message and any atta= chment(s). Any other use of the E-Mail by you is prohibited.=0A _______________________________________________________________________ This mailing list is neither sponsored nor endorsed by Invensys Process Systems (formerly The Foxboro Company). Use the info you obtain here at your own risks. Read http://www.thecassandraproject.org/disclaimer.html foxboro mailing list: //www.freelists.org/list/foxboro to subscribe: mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=join to unsubscribe: mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=leave