Re:[foxboro] Linux Thin Client as G Box Display We are running Display Manager currently, Foxview may be months or a year away, We are replacing WP30's which Foxboro recently decided not to support with the upgrade to 7.1.1. The linux thin clients boot from compact flash cards eliminating hard drives. The cost is as little as $200 new. Each display connection executes a new go_dm with blink_task forced on for each new session. We have tried numerous variations of go_dm and color pallettes with no success on the AW51G box, but good results on the AW51C box. Unfortunately we do not have the source code for blink_task which would probably answer some questions. I think the color pallettes originally used are ANSI colors which support the blinking attribute which blink_task uses to sync the blink. How it writes to the color pallette is unkown. We did disable blink_task and the exceed display does stop blinking. I know there must be a way to do it in linux but don't understand how pallette color aliases need to be configured. The primary problem is just getting the colors to work from the G-box. I can live without the blinking. John Spigel Clariant Corporation **************** Re: [foxboro] Linux Thin Client as G Box Display From: "John Metsker" <John.Metsker@xxxxxxxxxxxx> To: <foxboro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Tue, 16 Jan 2007 10:40:22 -0600 John, Foxview or DM running on your 7.1.1 G Box? My understanding is that the blinking colors used in the DM palette rely on some brut force mechanisms to substitute entries in the X color palette. This is the purpose of the blink task client. (Are you running a blink task for each remote X device?) =20 Foxview, due to the more modern underpinnings of the SL application, handle blinking colors with the X app itself. John Metsker General Mills, Inc=20 ******************* Re: [foxboro] Linux Thin Client as G Box Display From: "Doucet, Terrence" <tdoucet@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> To: <foxboro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Tue, 16 Jan 2007 10:02:31 -0500 "Move over to a G box" Does this mean you will take a stand-alone Foxboro AW or WP 51G and run = remote display manager on it connected to the node station by thin net? On node, host Display Manager, second port ------- thin net ----- AW51G = or WP51G If yes, then you can run into conflict with the blink_task program that = runs in your stand alone AW51G. Since the AW51G already has a blink_task = you should disable the remote display connection from starting a second = blink_task. Usually you can comment out the lines in your startup = script (copy of /opt/ia/.profile) in the host Foxboro station where the = Display Manager resides. Terry ************** Linux Thin Client as G Box Display Hello all knowing list members, I have been investigating using the latest linux thin clients in X as DM HMI displays with telnet. . We are 95% successful in getting the touchscreens,colors and fonts with NFS working on 6.1.1. What does not work is blinking colors. All else looks well. I have all but given up on the blinking. The plan is to move these over to a G box running 7.1.1. On the G box the fonts will work, but no progress on the colors. I cannot imagine what would be different. The color pallette has been brought over, but still no success. Exceed works well on both systems. I know there has been success in varying degrees on the older systems with versions on linux What could be different on the G box? The thin clients should be a benefit based on cost,, simple setup and maintenance. We are not winning on the simple part. John Spigel Clariant Coporation _______________________________________________________________________ This mailing list is neither sponsored nor endorsed by Invensys Process Systems (formerly The Foxboro Company). Use the info you obtain here at your own risks. Read http://www.thecassandraproject.org/disclaimer.html foxboro mailing list: //www.freelists.org/list/foxboro to subscribe: mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=join to unsubscribe: mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=leave