Re: [foxboro] Integrator 30 Style B failing (P0961BD-0E)
- From: Kashif Ijaz <kashifijaz93@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <foxboro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 15 Mar 2008 17:01:00 +0500
Kevin,
Thanks, after increasing the period of different compounds and staggering the
phases, I was able to bring down the I/O scan from 79% to 38%. Since then (
about a week back) , data communication is ok and we did not need to reset the
Integrator.
Regards,
Kashif Ijaz
INTECH Process Automation> Date: Sun, 9 Mar 2008 14:37:56 +0900> From:
fitzgerrell@xxxxxxxxx> To: foxboro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Subject: Re: [foxboro]
Integrator 30 Style B failing (P0961BD-0E)> > Kashif,> > What is the status of
the module when it fails?> LEDs are green, red, or red/green, any flashing?> In
system management, the module is showing failed? What about the> FBM0 and the
two PLC ECBs? When the MG30 fails can you interact with> it at all in SMDH -
reboot, offline, etc?> > If you've already changed all the Foxboro components
without> correcting the problem that'd suggest that something coming in from>
the PLCs is the problem. I've had similar issues with the gateway> hanging
because of unexpected modbus commands or responses. The> modbus gatewey and
integrator manual has a list of the supported> modbus commands/responses - it
is critical that no other> commands/responses are being generated. It may be
worthwhile to log> the traffic up until the point where your gateway fails.
With modbus> this is relatively easy to do - you can buy or build a serial "y">
adapter and use a PC or laptop to monitor the traffic. There are a> number of
free or inexpensive tools available on the net to analyze> this traffic. Is the
gateway the only master on this modbus network> or is there also a programming
PC? Would it be feasible to split the> gateway (even temporarily) so that the
SLC is on one module and the> Siemens is on the other? That way you could start
to isolate the> problem.> > Regards,> > Kevin FitzGerrell> > > > On Sun, Mar 9,
2008 at 2:08 PM, Kashif Ijaz <kashifijaz93@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:> > EEPROM
revision of MG30 is 3.30 . There is no dump file for this MG30 (letterbug
22MG54) whereas dump files for other stations exist. There is a general file
"dump_area.GW30".> >> > Regards,> >> > Kashif Ijaz> > >
_______________________________________________________________________> This
mailing list is neither sponsored nor endorsed by Invensys Process> Systems
(formerly The Foxboro Company). Use the info you obtain here at> your own
risks. Read http://www.thecassandraproject.org/disclaimer.html> > foxboro
mailing list: //www.freelists.org/list/foxboro> to subscribe:
mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=join> to unsubscribe:
mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=leave>
_________________________________________________________________
Discover the new Windows Vista
http://search.msn.com/results.aspx?q=windows+vista&mkt=en-US&form=QBRE
_______________________________________________________________________
This mailing list is neither sponsored nor endorsed by Invensys Process
Systems (formerly The Foxboro Company). Use the info you obtain here at
your own risks. Read http://www.thecassandraproject.org/disclaimer.html
foxboro mailing list: //www.freelists.org/list/foxboro
to subscribe: mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=join
to unsubscribe: mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=leave
Other related posts:
