Re: [foxboro] Integrator 30 Style B failing (P0961BD-0E)

  • From: Kashif Ijaz <kashifijaz93@xxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: <foxboro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Sat, 15 Mar 2008 17:01:00 +0500

Thanks, after increasing the period of different compounds and staggering the 
phases, I was able to bring down the I/O scan from 79% to 38%. Since then ( 
about a week back) , data communication is ok and we did not need to reset the 
Kashif Ijaz
INTECH Process Automation> Date: Sun, 9 Mar 2008 14:37:56 +0900> From: 
fitzgerrell@xxxxxxxxx> To: foxboro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Subject: Re: [foxboro] 
Integrator 30 Style B failing (P0961BD-0E)> > Kashif,> > What is the status of 
the module when it fails?> LEDs are green, red, or red/green, any flashing?> In 
system management, the module is showing failed? What about the> FBM0 and the 
two PLC ECBs? When the MG30 fails can you interact with> it at all in SMDH - 
reboot, offline, etc?> > If you've already changed all the Foxboro components 
without> correcting the problem that'd suggest that something coming in from> 
the PLCs is the problem. I've had similar issues with the gateway> hanging 
because of unexpected modbus commands or responses. The> modbus gatewey and 
integrator manual has a list of the supported> modbus commands/responses - it 
is critical that no other> commands/responses are being generated. It may be 
worthwhile to log> the traffic up until the point where your gateway fails. 
With modbus> this is relatively easy to do - you can buy or build a serial "y"> 
adapter and use a PC or laptop to monitor the traffic. There are a> number of 
free or inexpensive tools available on the net to analyze> this traffic. Is the 
gateway the only master on this modbus network> or is there also a programming 
PC? Would it be feasible to split the> gateway (even temporarily) so that the 
SLC is on one module and the> Siemens is on the other? That way you could start 
to isolate the> problem.> > Regards,> > Kevin FitzGerrell> > > > On Sun, Mar 9, 
2008 at 2:08 PM, Kashif Ijaz <kashifijaz93@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:> > EEPROM 
revision of MG30 is 3.30 . There is no dump file for this MG30 (letterbug 
22MG54) whereas dump files for other stations exist. There is a general file 
"dump_area.GW30".> >> > Regards,> >> > Kashif Ijaz> > > 
_______________________________________________________________________> This 
mailing list is neither sponsored nor endorsed by Invensys Process> Systems 
(formerly The Foxboro Company). Use the info you obtain here at> your own 
risks. Read> > foxboro 
mailing list:> to subscribe: 
mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=join> to unsubscribe: 
Discover the new Windows Vista
This mailing list is neither sponsored nor endorsed by Invensys Process
Systems (formerly The Foxboro Company). Use the info you obtain here at
your own risks. Read
foxboro mailing list:   
to subscribe:         mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=join
to unsubscribe:      mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=leave

Other related posts: