Re: [foxboro] AW51D Problem

  • From: "Kashif Ijaz" <kashifijaz93@xxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: <foxboro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2007 15:58:26 +0400

Dear Kevin

The whole string is "panic[cpu0]/thread=3D0x609c65a0:trap" in the
/var/adm/messages file.

The vmstat 10 10 gives me around 88% idle time on nearly all attempts.

When the display freezes, mouse does not move and you can do absolutely =
no
action. Also the last screen with the last values of process parameters =
is
frozen. Only resolution is to the turn the power to the box off and then =
on.
We are using version 4.3 of I/A.

Also there is no weight on the boxes.

Regards,

Kashif Ijaz
Senior Design & Application Engineer
INTECH Process Automation

-----Original Message-----
From: foxboro-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:foxboro-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] =
On
Behalf Of Kevin Fitzgerrell
Sent: Thursday, July 12, 2007 3:45 PM
To: foxboro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [foxboro] AW51D Problem

Kashif,

The information after the "Panic" is pretty important for determining
what the problem is.

If this has happened recently, take a look in the output of the dmesg
command or in the /var/adm/messages* files and see what the whole
panic string is.  Alternatively, go to /opt/crash/{letterbug} and do
"strings * | grep panic" and see what the panic strings have been.
There were some CPU issues with Ultrasparc-II CPUs - you may be seeing
cache or writeback data parity issues - these are CPU related.  Other
panic strings may point to memory problems.

64mb of ram seems small for an AW51D - can you email a copy of the
output of vmstat 10 10
in your reply?

Your problem with the display freezing is likely a different issue.
Many users have had an issue with the alarm manager causing the screen
to stop taking mouse/kbd input.  If the mouse moves but can't click
anything, try to log in remotely and kill the alarm manager task.  If
the screen un-freezes then you know that's the issue.  The alarm
manager will restart the next time the alarm button is selected.
There have been a number of Foxboro Helpful Hints and QFs that reduce
the incidence of this problem but I don't know if it is completely
resolved.  What I/A version are you at?

I've seen frequent other problems with the 51D series workstations -
they seem to be significantly less sturdy than the other boxes in the
51A-51E range.  I've had significantly more power supply, cpu and card
failures in these boxes.

If the boxes are being used on a desktop, ensure that they are not
supporting a heavy monitor.  Enough weight on the top of the case when
used horizontally can cause the box to panic or shut down.

Regards,

Kevin FitzGerrell
=20
=20
_______________________________________________________________________
This mailing list is neither sponsored nor endorsed by Invensys Process
Systems (formerly The Foxboro Company). Use the info you obtain here at
your own risks. Read http://www.thecassandraproject.org/disclaimer.html
=20
foxboro mailing list:             //www.freelists.org/list/foxboro
to subscribe:         =
mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=3Djoin
to unsubscribe:      =
mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=3Dleave
=20

 
 
_______________________________________________________________________
This mailing list is neither sponsored nor endorsed by Invensys Process
Systems (formerly The Foxboro Company). Use the info you obtain here at
your own risks. Read http://www.thecassandraproject.org/disclaimer.html
 
foxboro mailing list:             //www.freelists.org/list/foxboro
to subscribe:         mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=join
to unsubscribe:      mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=leave
 

Other related posts: