Re: [foxboro] AIM*OPC Server CLOSE_WAIT errors

  • From: "Johnson, Alex P (IOM)" <Alex.Johnson@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: "foxboro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx" <foxboro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Julie Zeilenga <JULIE@xxxxxxxxxxx>, Kevin Millar <kevin@xxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Thu, 14 Mar 2013 18:29:29 -0500

Julie is out until 1 April.
Kevin Millar is the developer. He might tell us which versions he's tested 
against.


Regards,
 
Alex Johnson
Invensys Operations Management
10900 Equity Drive
Houston, TX 77041
+1 713 329 8472 (desk)
+1 713 329 1600 (operator)
+1 713 329 1700 (Central Fax)
alex.johnson@xxxxxxxxxxxx 


-----Original Message-----
From: foxboro-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:foxboro-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On 
Behalf Of Johnson, Alex P (IOM)
Sent: Friday, March 15, 2013 7:23 AM
To: foxboro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx; Julie Zeilenga
Subject: Re: [foxboro] AIM*OPC Server CLOSE_WAIT errors

That is my understanding, but Julie is the one that would know.


Regards,
 
Alex Johnson
Invensys Operations Management
10900 Equity Drive
Houston, TX 77041
+1 713 329 8472 (desk)
+1 713 329 1600 (operator)
+1 713 329 1700 (Central Fax)
alex.johnson@xxxxxxxxxxxx 

-----Original Message-----
From: foxboro-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:foxboro-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On 
Behalf Of David R. Johnson
Sent: Friday, March 15, 2013 7:14 AM
To: foxboro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [foxboro] AIM*OPC Server CLOSE_WAIT errors

Well that's good news.  I'd still like to get the OPC interface working 
correctly, but I'm glad that fxbais is still going to be supported. I would 
assume the new foxbais would work at older I/A release levels with aim API 
installed. Do you know if that is the case?
Regards,
David
"Johnson, Alex P (IOM)" <Alex.Johnson@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

>Fxbais is update for V8.8 and is available from OSI. I saw the release notice. 
>
>Grant and I helped them update it. 
>
>Regards,
>
>Alex Johnson
>Invensys Operations Management
>10900 Equity Drive
>Houston, TX 77041
>+1 713 329 8472 (o)
>alex.Johnson@xxxxxxxxxxxx
>Sent from my iPhone. Please forgive the typos. 
>
>On Mar 15, 2013, at 6:36 AM, "Johnson, David" 
><David.Johnson@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>> The server has not been recently modified as far as we know.  It seems the 
>> problem has been with us since we put AIM*OPC Server on the box.  I believe 
>> there are other entries in the an_init.tcp file for the other AWs.  I will 
>> check that tomorrow morning and post my findings.
>> 
>> We are testing the OPC interface to PI (and I'm glad this is just a test) 
>> because I think the fxbais legacy interface is going to quit working at I/A 
>> version 8.8 when FoxAPI is no longer supported.  Does anyone know for sure?
>> 
>> That's all for today.
>> 
>> Thanks everybody.
>> David
>> 
>> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: foxboro-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:foxboro-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On 
>> Behalf Of Michael Toecker
>> Sent: Thursday, March 14, 2013 3:35 PM
>> To: foxboro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> Subject: Re: [foxboro] AIM*OPC Server CLOSE_WAIT errors
>> 
>> Was the PI server recently upgraded to Windows 2008 R2, or received patches? 
>>  I"m working a theory here.
>> In the meantime, you can use TCPView from Microsoft Sysinternals to 
>> !!!!CAREFULLY!!!! kill zombie (close_wait) connections on a periodic basis.
>> (http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/sysinternals/bb897437.aspx)
>> 
>> Mike Toecker
>> Digital Bond, Inc
>> 
>> On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 12:57 PM, Ted Jirik <ted.jirik@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>wrote:
>> 
>>> David,
>>> 
>>> Also be sure there is nothing in the AIM* Servers field in the opc
>>> server configurator / server parameters (advanced) tab
>>> 
>>> Ted
>>> 
>>> On Mar 14, 2013, at 10:37 AM, Ted Jirik <ted.jirik@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>> 
>>>> David,
>>>> 
>>>> Just spoke to our field service rep and he verified my thinking.
>>>> That is
>>> what we did to solve it at two sites.
>>>> 
>>>> Reboot after changes?
>>>> 
>>>> Be sure other servers are not listed in your an_init.tcp file?
>>>> 
>>>> Ted
>>>> 
>>>> On Mar 14, 2013, at 8:48 AM, "Johnson, David" <
>>> David.Johnson@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>> Ted,
>>>>> 
>>>>> That sounds like a potential problem, but we checked, and the
>>>>> disable
>>> broadcast box was checked in APIAdmin on ALL of the AWs listed.  We
>>> only have AIM*OPC Server on SRVONE, there are no other OPC servers or
>>> clients on the DCS network.  So I still don't know why the AIM*OPC
>>> Server is attempting to talk to the other AWs.  And although I only
>>> listed 2 sample netstat lines with the CLOSE_WAIT there are many,
>>> possibly hundreds, to each AW after a few days.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Any other ideas?
>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>> David
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>>> From: foxboro-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>> [mailto:foxboro-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
>>> On Behalf Of Ted Jirik
>>>>> Sent: Thursday, March 14, 2013 9:32 AM
>>>>> To: foxboro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>> Subject: Re: [foxboro] AIM*OPC Server CLOSE_WAIT errors
>>>>> 
>>>>> David,
>>>>> 
>>>>> We had the same problem. As I recall we had to disable broadcast
>>> requests under edit server connection in apiadmin. We did this on all
>>> stations and the problem went away.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Ted
>>>>> 
>>>>> On Mar 14, 2013, at 6:25 AM, Johnson, David wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>>> Hello All,
>>>>>> We have an AIM*OPC server installed on an AW running Win 2003 Server.
>>> The OPC server is working (will return data, no errors).  We have an
>>> OSI PI data collector running.  It will connect to and get data from
>>> I/A via the OPC link.  This will work for several days, but then the
>>> AW becomes so unresponsive, it must be rebooted.  After a reboot the
>>> problem goes away for a day or two, and then returns.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> ______________________________________________________________________
>>> _ This mailing list is neither sponsored nor endorsed by Invensys
>>> Process Systems (formerly The Foxboro Company). Use the info you
>>> obtain here at your own risks. Read
>>> http://www.thecassandraproject.org/disclaimer.html
>>> 
>>> foxboro mailing list:             //www.freelists.org/list/foxboro
>>> to subscribe:         mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=join
>>> to unsubscribe:      mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=leave
>> 
>> 
>> --
>> 
>> Michael Toecker
>> Head Dragon Slayer
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________________________________
>> This mailing list is neither sponsored nor endorsed by Invensys Process 
>> Systems (formerly The Foxboro Company). Use the info you obtain here at your 
>> own risks. Read http://www.thecassandraproject.org/disclaimer.html
>> 
>> foxboro mailing list:             //www.freelists.org/list/foxboro
>> to subscribe:         mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=join
>> to unsubscribe:      mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=leave
>> 
>> 
>> Confidentiality Notice:
>> 
>> The information contained in this message is private and confidential.  This 
>> information is intended only for  the individual or entity named above.  If 
>> the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby 
>> notified that any use, review, dissemination, distribution, copying or 
>> action taken based on this message or its attachments, if any, is strictly 
>> prohibited.  If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the 
>> sender by reply email and delete or destroy all copies of this message and 
>> any attachments.  Thank you.
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________________________________
>> This mailing list is neither sponsored nor endorsed by Invensys Process
>> Systems (formerly The Foxboro Company). Use the info you obtain here at
>> your own risks. Read http://www.thecassandraproject.org/disclaimer.html
>> 
>> foxboro mailing list:             //www.freelists.org/list/foxboro
>> to subscribe:         mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=join
>> to unsubscribe:      mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=leave
>> 
>> 
>
> 
> 
>_______________________________________________________________________
>This mailing list is neither sponsored nor endorsed by Invensys Process
>Systems (formerly The Foxboro Company). Use the info you obtain here at
>your own risks. Read http://www.thecassandraproject.org/disclaimer.html
> 
>foxboro mailing list:             //www.freelists.org/list/foxboro
>to subscribe:         mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=join
>to unsubscribe:      mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=leave
> 
>
 
 
_______________________________________________________________________
This mailing list is neither sponsored nor endorsed by Invensys Process
Systems (formerly The Foxboro Company). Use the info you obtain here at
your own risks. Read http://www.thecassandraproject.org/disclaimer.html
 
foxboro mailing list:             //www.freelists.org/list/foxboro
to subscribe:         mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=join
to unsubscribe:      mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=leave
 

 
 
_______________________________________________________________________
This mailing list is neither sponsored nor endorsed by Invensys Process
Systems (formerly The Foxboro Company). Use the info you obtain here at
your own risks. Read http://www.thecassandraproject.org/disclaimer.html
 
foxboro mailing list:             //www.freelists.org/list/foxboro
to subscribe:         mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=join
to unsubscribe:      mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=leave
 

 
 
_______________________________________________________________________
This mailing list is neither sponsored nor endorsed by Invensys Process
Systems (formerly The Foxboro Company). Use the info you obtain here at
your own risks. Read http://www.thecassandraproject.org/disclaimer.html
 
foxboro mailing list:             //www.freelists.org/list/foxboro
to subscribe:         mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=join
to unsubscribe:      mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=leave
 

Other related posts: