[familyschool] Re: Talking points for board outreach

  • From: bmarget macpag <brymarmacpag@xxxxxxxxx>
  • To: familyschool@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Sun, 1 Jun 2014 23:00:42 -0500

Oh Sherri....


On Sun, Jun 1, 2014 at 9:45 PM, Alexandrea Spencer Kouame <
spencerad@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> It seems that the teacher email is causing more confusion.  Maybe I'm the
> one confused.  This is Sherri's FB Status:
>
> I am sorry if students and families were put through all of this for
> "nothing". I am embarrassed to have any part of it. I am done responding to
> emails tonight!
>
> ------------------------------
> From: spencerad@xxxxxxxxxxx
> To: familyschool@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: [familyschool] Re: Talking points for board outreach
> Date: Mon, 2 Jun 2014 02:40:21 +0000
>
>
> I just got off the phone with Sarah.  One of my first things I said was
> that I feel certain that if Toni stays on as Executive Director that the
> teachers will leave.  She said that the email that Brynne sent out today
> seemed to say the contrary and that it seems like the teachers want to work
> for a solution.  I said that is true if the solution doesn't include Toni
> as the Executive Director.  Several other things she mentioned are below
> but I ended the conversation stating very firmly that from what I have
> learned, I truly believe with every fiber of my being that if Toni remains
> the Executive Director that the teachers will leave.
>
> Other items:
>
> Sarah wants to be accountable to the community but she also wants to
> uphold the integrity of the closed meeting.
>
> She has received no council on what she can or can't say.
>
> She mentioned that she received emails from teachers and I've asked her if
> that has caused her to change her mind.  She gave me a diluted answer
> stating that she is listening to everyone's opinions and she wants everyone
> to come together for a solution.
>
> She will be at the meetings tomorrow and Tuesday.
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
> From: pazlapuchica@xxxxxxxxxxx
> To: familyschool@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: [familyschool] Talking points for board outreach
> Date: Sun, 1 Jun 2014 13:45:25 -0500
>
> Sorry this is a bit late . . (been working most of the weekend) Thanks to
> Johnny and Jessica for input and suggestions.
>
> Our goal is to work with current board members to resolve issues and keep
> the school moving forward.  You can preface conversation by stating that
> parents and teachers have not been able to share information face to face
> with the board which has made this process hard. The board has been stuck
> with a difficult decision and a very trying time for governance but it is
> their job to hear all that has brought us to this point and in the end
> support the parents, students, school, teachers and the process that has
> made southside so very successful.
>
> To that end please be respectul and use these points to guide your
> conversation.  Thanks and good luck!  Please reply to me how your talks
> went.  Thanks ! Brian
> ------------------------------
>
>
>
>    - Be respectful! may be obvious but i really do feel current board
>    members are feeling defensive and we need to be dignified when doing our
>    outreach
>
>
>    - Recognize and appreciate their service during this very difficult
>    and challenging time (mooooch!)
>    - Emphasize that we need their help! A vote was taken earlier this
>    week where all viewpoints were not presented and there appeared to be no
>    transparency (no teacher perspective was offered)
>    - Encourage them to attend on tuesday (some members may be fearful to
>    show due to backlash or perception that they will be verbally attacked) and
>    come with an OPEN mind to hear the teacher's perspective and other relevant
>    info about our authorizer
>    - Teachers want the school to be sustainable and compliant. They are
>    invested in the school and many have children and grandchildren as current
>    and future students
>    - Toni (ED) has presented this as a compliance issue and painted the
>    picture that the current teachers are resistant to being compliant -
>    emphasize that is is a labor/personnel (workplace) issue that has not been
>    fully investigated and again feel free to emphasize that the teachers want
>    to maintain and uphold compliance issues
>    - VOA (our authorizer) was present to talk with parents on Friday -
>    VOA wants to maintain their relationship with SFCS. They will continue to
>    be our authorizer if the current director leaves. This contradicts what
>    Toni has stated parents and board members and it is important to point out
>    this contraction
>    - Encourage action to save our school! *advocate* for a *new vote* on
>    the current ED with the info they will receive on Tuesday
>
>
>
>
>
>

Other related posts: