On Tue, 8 Feb 2005 09:36:07 -0700, Deb <deb.l.pearson@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > I'm trying hard to read up on the semantics of Windows 2003 SMTP. What > I'm finding is a lot of products that overlay Windows - why? Why does > Windows need additional products? Is Windows not good enough on its own? The IIS 4.0, 5.0, and 6.0 SMTP service is a very simple MTA. If all you need is a simple MTA, then obviously it will do the job for you. What is a simple MTA? In my opinion, it's one that is: -Primarily configured through a GUI in Windows with check boxes and radio buttons -Has a limited configuration in comparision to Postfix, Sendmail, qmail, Exim, etc. -Has limited customization " " -Has basic RFC compliance -Does not support extensive add-ons (For example: http://www.postfix.org/addon.html) -Limited content and connection filtering In other words, it was designed as an MTA, and it does just that. All of these add-on's go beyond the conventional role of an MTA - to transfer email between servers. Personally, the IIS 6.0 SMTP service is great for internal SMTP communication, however, I prefer to have Postfix as my Internet facing SMTP MTA server/firewall/gateway. With this configuration, not only do I not have to worry about security patches on my Internet accessible services, but I also have an almost infinite level of configuration options. ...D