[Debatewise RRT] Re: debates
- From: macmarie123@xxxxxxx
- To: debatewiserrt@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2009 14:55:56 -0500
I'll take the boxing one.
Thanks,
Marie
-----Original Message-----
From: Alex Helling <alex@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: debatewiserrt@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Wed, 11 Nov 2009 16:30
Subject: [Debatewise RRT] Re: debates
Yeh sounds interesting and worth a debate of its own. Feel free to do your own
debates whenever, especially at the moment as at HQ we are all very busy on our
Copenhagen GYP project so I am not monitoring the RRT as closely as I have
sometimes been, and am less able to send out more debates to occupy your time!
Alex
From: debatewiserrt-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:debatewiserrt-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Sarah Lynch
Sent: 11 November 2009 16:12
To: debatewiserrt@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [Debatewise RRT] Re: debates
Ive just been reading my latest news headlines on the bbc news website and the
governments new proposals regarding the DNA database to create a loophole
around the European Human Right's court ruling that Britain's database was
illegal is interesting- can I start that one up? There is one about a DNA
daatbase generally, but it doesnt relate to whether the UK is justified in
tailoring its database policies to avoid the Strasbourg court ruling. Let me
know what you think - and any help on wording the title!
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk_politics/8354850.stm
thats the link im reading from.
Sarah
Other related posts:
