[ddots-l] Re: CakeTalking in a 64 bit system
- From: "Phil Muir" <info@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <ddots-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 15 Dec 2009 18:45:58 -0000
That's why I am purchassing Windows7 today.
Regards, Phil Muir
Accessibility Training
Telephone: US (615) 713-2021
UK+44-1747-821-794
Mobile: UK +44-7968-136-246
E-mail:
info@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:info@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
URL:
www.accessibilitytraining.co.uk/ <http://www.accessibilitytraining.co.uk/>
-----Original Message-----
From: ddots-l-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:ddots-l-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of Bryan Smart
Sent: 15 December 2009 18:30
To: ddots-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [ddots-l] Re: CakeTalking in a 64 bit system
That's true. Netbooks have been one of the last class of computers to ship
with XP due to the relatively low processor/memory requirements of XP when
compared with Vista.
However, after the end of the year, even system builders won't be able to
purchase XP. Consumers haven't been able to directly purchase XP for some
time. In 2010 and beyond, basic netbooks will include Windows 7 Starter
Edition instead of XP SP3.
XP really is just about dead. 8 or 9 years is an eternity for the life of a
desktop operating system. Windows 7's improvements in security, wireless and
home networking, power management, search, newer base drivers and hardware
support are all important reasons why XP is dramatically out of date. Many
of those improvements were in Vista, but Vista was bloated. Windows 7 isn't.
Bryan
-----Original Message-----
From: ddots-l-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:ddots-l-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On
Behalf Of Phil Muir
Sent: Tuesday, December 15, 2009 1:16 PM
To: ddots-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [ddots-l] Re: CakeTalking in a 64 bit system
Don't think so. In fact, they have started shipping XP disks with SP3 on
them. XP gained more life due to it's use in netbooks.
Regards, Phil Muir
Accessibility Training
Telephone: US (615) 713-2021
UK+44-1747-821-794
Mobile: UK +44-7968-136-246
E-mail:
info@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
URL:
www.accessibilitytraining.co.uk/
-----Original Message-----
From: ddots-l-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:ddots-l-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of Omar Binno
Sent: 15 December 2009 18:10
To: ddots-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [ddots-l] Re: CakeTalking in a 64 bit system
Thanks Bryan. With the release of w7, microsoft isn't planning to
stop updating xp anytime soon just to force consumers to upgrade, are they?
Omar Binno
Website: www.omarbinno.com
AIM: LOD1116
Skype: obinno1
----- Original Message -----
From: Bryan Smart <mailto:bryansmart@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: ddots-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Tuesday, December 15, 2009 1:07 PM
Subject: [ddots-l] Re: CakeTalking in a 64 bit system
I have a swappable hard drive on my DAW, and so have both
32-bit Windows XP and 64-bit Windows 7 available on separate hard drives.
About the only major benefit that I've encountered with
Windows 7 64-bit so far is the well-known benefit of more memory available
to plugs than on XP. That's it. Nothing runs faster. 64-bit Sonar will
definitely make a difference in terms of speed, but that isn't available
yet. Even the memory isn't a big help to me at this point. It is rare that I
use more than 1.8GB of memory in my Sonar projects, and XP can handle that
just fine.
If you're starting with a new DAW, then you should go ahead
with 64-bit Windows 7. However, unless you're a power user, or enjoy
tinkering with techy things, I'd suggest that most CT users not bother with
upgrading their current DAWs yet. There just aren't enough advantages for
the typical user to justify the headaches.
I definitely suggest that anyone with a DAW from Dancing
Dots call us to talk about your options before upgrading to Windows 7.
Bryan
-----Original Message-----
From: ddots-l-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:ddots-l-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Phil Muir
Sent: Monday, December 14, 2009 8:21 AM
To: ddots-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [ddots-l] Re: CakeTalking in a 64 bit system
No, about to go 64 bit myself.
Regards, Phil Muir
Accessibility Training
Telephone: US (615) 713-2021
UK+44-1747-821-794
Mobile: UK +44-7968-136-246
E-mail:
info@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
URL:
www.accessibilitytraining.co.uk/
-----Original Message-----
From: ddots-l-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:ddots-l-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of Omar Binno
Sent: 14 December 2009 05:18
To: ddots-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [ddots-l] Re: CakeTalking in a 64 bit system
sounds like it might still be good to stick with xp for a
while then?
Omar Binno
Website: www.omarbinno.com
AIM: LOD1116
Skype: obinno1
----- Original Message -----
From: D!J!X! <mailto:megamansuperior@xxxxxxxxxxx>
To: ddots-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Monday, December 14, 2009 12:12 AM
Subject: [ddots-l] Re: CakeTalking in a 64 bit system
It's not a matter of 64 or 32 bit, jaws11 in general is
average with win7. People have reported driver problems with the video
intercept, some of which i've personally experienced. i've also experienced
random crashes on various machine configurations, both 32 and 64, using
jaws11 and win7. This didn't occur in jaws10, and jaws11 does sem to get
stuck in certain areas of the windows UI sometimes and requires a restart
and/or a screen refresh to work properly. This again is on various machines,
not isolated to 1 single machine. In terms of scripts, jaws11 is better, it
actually reads the list views and the selections, though be it a little
buggy sometimes, it does support the system tray function, the start menu
and the new calculator amongst other things. But the program itself seems a
bit buggy to me on every day use... If you can deal with those minimal
issues, you should be ok. I must say however that the research it feature is
very handy to quickly lookup stuff...
HTH, D!J!X!
________________________________
From: ddots-l-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:ddots-l-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Omar Binno
Sent: Sunday, December 13, 2009 10:44 PM
To: ddots-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [ddots-l] Re: CakeTalking in a 64 bit system
djx,
how would you actually rate jaws 11 with windows 7 64-bit?
does it work very well, or just average?
Omar Binno
Website: www.omarbinno.com
AIM: LOD1116
Skype: obinno1
----- Original Message -----
From: D!J!X! <mailto:megamansuperior@xxxxxxxxxxx>
To: ddots-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Sunday, December 13, 2009 10:36 PM
Subject: [ddots-l] Re: CakeTalking in a 64 bit system
Yes jaws64 works under win7, jaws10 has somewhat limited
support, while
jaws11 has better support, though it's kind of buggy... If
you were to use
jaws under windows 7 I'd recommend jaws11, that goes for 32
or 64
platforms...
HTH, D!J!X!
-----Original Message-----
From: ddots-l-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:ddots-l-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On
Behalf Of Jörgen Hansson
Sent: Sunday, December 13, 2009 9:10 PM
To: ddots-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [ddots-l] Re: CakeTalking in a 64 bit system
Hi erik!
as far as I know, jaws is now in both 32 and 64 bit for
windows 7, well, I
haven't tried it out yet, but I sure will do when I get
money for purchasing
windows 7.
I'm running sonar 8.5 on an XP machine, and it's working
great.
Oh, by the way. Welcom to the list, I'm Jörgen Hansson,from
sweden as well.
Hope you'll have a good time with us on this wonderful list.
Regards,
Jörgen Hansson!
Tel +46 703-601296
www.jorgenhansson.com
skype: djtropical4532
----- Original Message -----
From: "Erik Bryndahl" <erik@xxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <ddots-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Sunday, December 13, 2009 4:56 PM
Subject: [ddots-l] CakeTalking in a 64 bit system
> Hello,
>
> My name is Erik Bryndahl and I live in Sweden. I'm new on
this list
> and I'm amazed to see how many people there are out there
working with
> the same things I am.
>
> I'm just about to install Sonar and CakeTalking in a
system of Windows
> 7
> 64 bit.
>
> My question is wich wersion of Sonar is needed and is it
possible to
> install it 64 bit?
> another question I have is if the CakeTalking scripts are
available in
> a version that is compatible with Windows 7 64 bit?
>
> Regards
>
> Erik Bryndahl
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Tim Burgess" <tim@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> To: <ddots-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Sunday, December 13, 2009 4:12 PM
> Subject: [ddots-l] Re: superior drummer question
>
>
>> Jbridge.
>>
>> Best wishes.
>>
>> Tim Burgess
>> Raised Bar Ltd
>> Phone: +44 (0)1827 719822
>> Mobile: 07989 486976
>> Web: http://www.raisedbar.net
>> Facebook:
>>
http://www.facebook.com/pages/Atherstone-United-Kingdom/Raised-Bar-Lt
>> d/12023
>> 4896800
>>
>> Don't forget to vote for improved access to music and
music
>> technology at
>>
>> http://www.raisedbar.net/petition.htm
>>
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: ddots-l-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> [mailto:ddots-l-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
>> On
>> Behalf Of D!J!X!
>> Sent: 13 December 2009 14:05
>> To: ddots-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> Subject: [ddots-l] Re: superior drummer question
>>
>> I don't think so, I'm already looking into that, it does
work with
>> the other bit bridge-like program that sonar supports, I
forget the
>> name right now.
>> Not sure if they've fixed it yet, but last I heard sd
didn't work
>> properly with the cakewalk bit bridge; I think I read
somewhere that
>> sonar78.5.1 fixed this issue though. If you don't have
8.5 you can
>> perhaps use the other bit bridge-like program, maybe
somebody else
>> can chime in with the correct name for the program... Or
maybe
>> toontrack will release a x64 bit version.
>> Hmm actually, not sure if version 2.2 makes this leap
already...
>>
>> HTH, D!J!X!
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: ddots-l-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> [mailto:ddots-l-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
>> On
>> Behalf Of Len Viljoen
>> Sent: Sunday, December 13, 2009 8:02 AM
>> To: ddots-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> Subject: [ddots-l] superior drummer question
>>
>>
>>
>> Hi all. Do anyone of you know if superior drummer will
work in a 64
>> bit environment? Let's say I use a 64 operating system
with sonar 32 bit.
>> Will
>> sd work?
>> Kind regards
>> Len Viljoen
>> Gospel Singer
>> Website: www.inspiritministries.co.za
>> Email: len@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> Tel: 023 3470022
>> Mobile: 082 3954286
>> Fax: 023 3470022
>> Skype: lenviljoen
>>
>>
>> PLEASE READ THIS FOOTER AT LEAST ONCE!
>> To leave the list, click on the immediately following
link:
>> ddots-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe
>> If this link doesn't work then send a message to:
>> ddots-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> and in the Subject line type
>> unsubscribe
>> For other list commands such as vacation mode, click on
the
>> immediately following link:
>> ddots-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=faq or send a
message, to
>> ddots-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx and in the Subject line
type faq
>>
>>
>> PLEASE READ THIS FOOTER AT LEAST ONCE!
>> To leave the list, click on the immediately following
link:
>> ddots-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe
>> If this link doesn't work then send a message to:
>> ddots-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> and in the Subject line type
>> unsubscribe
>> For other list commands such as vacation mode, click on
the
>> immediately following link:
>> ddots-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=faq or send a
message, to
>> ddots-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx and in the Subject line
type faq
>>
>>
>> PLEASE READ THIS FOOTER AT LEAST ONCE!
>> To leave the list, click on the immediately following
link:
>> ddots-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe
>> If this link doesn't work then send a message to:
>> ddots-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> and in the Subject line type
>> unsubscribe
>> For other list commands such as vacation mode, click on
the
>> immediately following link:
>> ddots-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=faq or send a
message, to
>> ddots-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx and in the Subject line
type faq
>>
>>
>> __________ NOD32 4683 (20091213) Information __________
>>
>> Detta meddelande är genomsökt av NOD32 Antivirus.
>> http://www.nod32.com
>>
>>
>
> PLEASE READ THIS FOOTER AT LEAST ONCE!
> To leave the list, click on the immediately following
link:
> ddots-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe
> If this link doesn't work then send a message to:
> ddots-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> and in the Subject line type
> unsubscribe
> For other list commands such as vacation mode, click on
the
> immediately following link:
> ddots-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=faq or send a
message, to
> ddots-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx and in the Subject line type
faq
>
>
PLEASE READ THIS FOOTER AT LEAST ONCE!
To leave the list, click on the immediately following link:
ddots-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe
If this link doesn't work then send a message to:
ddots-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
and in the Subject line type
unsubscribe
For other list commands such as vacation mode,
click on the immediately following link:
ddots-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=faq or
send a message, to
ddots-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
and in the Subject line type
faq
PLEASE READ THIS FOOTER AT LEAST ONCE!
To leave the list, click on the immediately following link:
ddots-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=subscribe
If this link doesn't work then send a message to:
ddots-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
and in the Subject line type
unsubscribe
For other list commands such as vacation mode,
click on the immediately following link:
ddots-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subjectúq or
send a message, to
ddots-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
and in the Subject line type
faq
PLEASE READ THIS FOOTER AT LEAST ONCE!
To leave the list, click on the immediately following link:
ddots-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=subscribe
If this link doesn't work then send a message to:
ddots-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
and in the Subject line type
unsubscribe
For other list commands such as vacation mode,
click on the immediately following link:
ddots-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subjectúq or
send a message, to
ddots-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
and in the Subject line type
faq
PLEASE READ THIS FOOTER AT LEAST ONCE!
To leave the list, click on the immediately following link:
ddots-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=subscribe
If this link doesn't work then send a message to:
ddots-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
and in the Subject line type
unsubscribe
For other list commands such as vacation mode,
click on the immediately following link:
ddots-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subjectúq or
send a message, to
ddots-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
and in the Subject line type
faq
Other related posts:
