Well put Dougie and I think the nub of the problem is getting that rather delicate balance right regardless of political ideology, country, etc. There's a long walk ahead before this mess gets sorted out ATB Shaun On 14/02/2015 18:33, doug wrote: > > > POTUS says in the same article: > > Quote: "The president, in outlining his executive order, acknowledged > the history of breached trust and the challenge that poses: "In all > our work we have to make sure we are protecting the privacy and civil > liberty of the American people. And we grapple with these issues in > government. We've pursued important reforms to make sure we are > respecting peoples' privacy as well as ensuring our national > security." end of quote. > > Obviously he represents the citizens of the USA. However, because > that leaves the rest of us in limbo, the rest of the world doesn't > have any rights as far as the USA and its organisations are concerned, > then there is no point in co-operating with the USA, the intelligence > and security services or the US global corporations. > > Until the US government is prepared to respect the international and > national human rights of people and their organisations, and the > privacy and the security of other peoples and their governments...any > moves by the US government ain't gonna work, will be considered as > hype, and people will continue to mistrust, to hack, to compete, to > undermine, just as the USA does to them...with impunity. And that, > as the the ruling elites are discovering, very slowly...is no good for > any economic system. I also apply the same principles to the ruling > elites of other nation states by the way, and not just having a dig on > the basis that "we are better than thou".. > > Now, if POTUS and the US and other ruling circles were to screw the > nut and realise that they have to share and not attempt to take, take, > take everything all the time, then the IT world might just get on to a > better footing. The US is not alone in that respect, lots of > governments have picked up bad habits and followed the US example, and > they have all learned from each other. Obviously, it is going to be > done the hard way, when it starts to cost so much that the economy or > business becomes unsustainable, then there will be a willingness to > compromise. After all to win hearts and minds, one has to grab them > by the goolies...now who said that...I wonder. > > Perhaps we need to go back to the good old days when governments had > to get a warrant to monitor or surveil the citizens of the world, > instead of the carte blanche grab all mentality. We need > internationally enforceable human rights laws...and again...the USA is > not keen to be a party to that. All this information gathering is bad > for ordinary individuals, because the information can be distorted, > bits of it selected or telescoped, so that it looks like conspiracies > are taking place. > > In the UK, the GCHQ has an agency which helps companies to develop > better security... > > see url: http://www.cesg.gov.uk/Pages/homepage.aspx > > However, how many people or companies use it...is a different matter. > It must be quite difficult for a body corporate to go to the CESG for > help, especially, when their leadership hears all about the dirty > tricks, the double dealing and the backdoor hypocrisy that goes on. > > Can we set up a situation where cypherpunks and the NSA work nicely > and constructively together...:-) ...because that is what is needed. > Can the NSA work with the Chinese and vikki verki...without > compromising the rights of the citizens of both nation states...that > is the problem > > > The US lead in information technology, and its sheer size, isn't going > to last for much longer. At least, if the FBI etc are coming out of > the closet and starting to share information with US companies > commercially and telling the world that they are doing that, it is an > advance, rather than doing it in secret. But it does raise a new set > of questions and problems... > ATB > Dougie. > > > > On 14/02/15 14:15, John Young wrote: >> http://www.cbsnews.com/news/obamas-cybersecurity-plan-why-the-government-cant-protect-us/ >> >> >> "Dave DeWalt, CEO of security firm Mandiant, a participant in >> Friday's summit, hopes that fear of privacy invasion won't get in the >> way of the work that needs to get done. He pointed to the way the way >> public backlash to government surveillance programs revealed by >> former NSA contractor Edward Snowden stymied previous efforts to >> effectively open the lines of communication. >> >> "This balance between privacy and security ebbs and flows and >> unfortunately that was a huge setback -- a setback to the tune of >> several years," he said. >> >> via cypherpunks >> > -- *_PRIVACY IS A BASIC RIGHT - NOT A CONCESSION _* https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2014/11/when-time-comes-we-need-be-ready-fight-tpps-secret-anti-user-agenda