Re: DRE: CTS community mail

  • From: Manase Zote <bmlzote@xxxxxxxxx>
  • To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2015 20:22:19 +0200

Oh yeah!
On 26 Jan 2015 17:36, "Ryan Williams" <ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> I'm there bro. Manase, are you in?
> On 26 Jan 2015 16:59, "euraima tobias" <euraima@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>> Yes sure, let me know who's all keen?
>> On 26 Jan 2015 4:39 PM, "sameegh jardine" <sameegh@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>>> The struggle is real.
>>>
>>> Speaking of which, offline session Wednesday? Khan?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Mon, Jan 26, 2015 at 4:35 PM, lindsey kiviets <lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> when we having the next ggxrd tournament?
>>>>
>>>> Suggestion:
>>>>
>>>> 1 Dedicated ft2 winnerstayson console
>>>>
>>>> ban hitboxes
>>>>
>>>> ban elphelt as she is not in arcade yet
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ------------------------------
>>>> Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2015 14:16:21 +0200
>>>> Subject: RE: DRE: CTS community mail
>>>> From: ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx
>>>> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Would be awesome if we could use Jeeva's place again for EVO but we'll
>>>> have to confirm with him. If he's there again on Saturday, l'll chat to him
>>>> about it.
>>>>
>>>> On a somewhat related note, l'm thinking of running sessions at
>>>> Kamimodo on the 21st and 28th of Feb. Yay or nay?
>>>> On 26 Jan 2015 12:41, "Donaldson, Alasdair" <
>>>> alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>  I wonder how this affects streams. Are they actually making money off
>>>> the stream, or is the advertising that generates the cash. Also if people
>>>> make donations to the stream, is that exempt from the ‘selling footage’
>>>> thing? If they don’t air the stream unless they meet a certain amount of
>>>> donations, does that then qualify as selling?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Speaking of which, are we doing Jeevas place again for Evo?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Oh, and here is a picture of one of my cats, Tom.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> *From:* cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:
>>>> cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] *On Behalf Of *sameegh jardine
>>>> *Sent:* 26 January 2015 12:31 PM
>>>> *To:* cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>> *Subject:* Re: DRE: CTS community mail
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Ah okay, that's pretty interesting. So if you record a tournament of a
>>>> particular game (KI as an example) you aren't allowed to sell the
>>>> tournament footage at all? I wonder if that disclaimer is made explicit
>>>> when one buys a video game not that I ever bother to read through any of it
>>>> :P
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Mon, Jan 26, 2015 at 12:20 PM, Wynand-Ben <paashaasggx@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>  MS recently redid their policy around this.  They are pretty open and
>>>> chill now.  You can monetize stuff through adds and all that but you arent
>>>> allowed to sell the videos at all.
>>>>
>>>> Only really odd requirement they have is that you are not allowed to
>>>> use the games name in the video description...
>>>>  ------------------------------
>>>>
>>>> Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2015 12:15:22 +0200
>>>> Subject: Re: DRE: CTS community mail
>>>> From: sameegh@xxxxxxxxx
>>>> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Not quite the same but on a similar note I recently read an
>>>> article about Microsoft possibly enforcing additional controls over their
>>>> games and not allowing third parties to directly generate income from them.
>>>> I think guys were saying that it may become illegal for tournament
>>>> organizers to generate income by streaming or using their games to do so
>>>> unless they'd obtained permission from Microsoft itself. Personally I don't
>>>> see it happening any time soon - if at all -  but who knows, laws around
>>>> these sorts of things always seem fuzzy and the streaming industry is
>>>> becoming pretty massive with ludicrous sums of prize money being thrown
>>>> around so maybe?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Mon, Jan 26, 2015 at 11:50 AM, Donaldson, Alasdair <
>>>> alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>  Gaming companies in Japan seem to be against it in general. That’s
>>>> why they complain so much about youtube and fight to get any references to
>>>> their games removed, including (sometimes positive) game reviews. They seem
>>>> to believe that all references to the game that aren’t under their control
>>>> are evil. It’s this rabid fear of youtube that lands them up accidentally
>>>> shutting down their own channels for copyright infringement.
>>>>
>>>> *From:* cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:
>>>> cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] *On Behalf Of *Di Lhong
>>>> *Sent:* 26 January 2015 11:45 AM
>>>> *To:* cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>> *Subject:* Re: DRE: CTS community mail
>>>>
>>>>  T7 releasing in Jap arcade on Feb 18. Hopefully they will stream or
>>>> post some vids.
>>>>
>>>>  I remember reading somewhere that Japs are against twitch and
>>>> streaming gaming vids. Or is that only Nintendo?
>>>>
>>>>  On Mon, Jan 26, 2015 at 7:45 AM, Nicholas Robertson-Muir <
>>>> nicmuir@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> I can relate.
>>>>   On 26 Jan 2015 06:59, "Stephen Scheidel" <gieroadsteve@xxxxxxxxx>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>  I don't want to go to wurk.
>>>>  I want to escape with the kitties.
>>>>
>>>> ​
>>>>
>>>>  On 25 January 2015 at 23:09, Ilitirit Sama <ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>  Because it's not them who uploaded it to youtube...
>>>>
>>>>  On Sun, Jan 25, 2015 at 10:15 PM, richard moorcroft <
>>>> greattekkenmaster@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> The japanese has the best tech right?? So why does it always look so
>>>> blokkie kaka quality??
>>>>   On Jan 25, 2015 10:09 PM, "Ashraf Barendse" <
>>>> ashraf.barendse@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>  Potemkin is low tier, the player is top tier.
>>>>
>>>>  Yeah, Jap footage always looks sucky, even at higher res.
>>>>  I know that videos taken from Nico Nico will look like that, because
>>>> they limit the res.
>>>>  Still doesn't explain why all their videos look like 240p.
>>>>
>>>>  On Sun, Jan 25, 2015 at 9:58 PM, Wynand-Ben <paashaasggx@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>  Would have been hot if it wasnt recorded with potato...
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>  While on the subject I really wish the god damned japs could figure
>>>> out how to capture shit at a proper bitrate/resolution...  the majority of
>>>> their footage looks like ass.
>>>>  ------------------------------
>>>>  From: ashraf.barendse@xxxxxxxxx
>>>> Date: Sun, 25 Jan 2015 21:22:54 +0200
>>>> Subject: Re: DRE: CTS community mail
>>>> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>
>>>>  Sickest Potemkin ever
>>>>  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z2ztjD8rBzQ
>>>>
>>>>  On Sun, Jan 25, 2015 at 1:52 PM, Wynand-Ben <paashaasggx@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>  Dude is entertaining to watch.
>>>>
>>>>  I rather enjoyed his sci-fi science show
>>>>  ------------------------------
>>>>  From: lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx
>>>> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>> Subject: RE: DRE: CTS community mail
>>>> Date: Sun, 25 Jan 2015 10:06:42 +0000
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OUVw6Pn6GTg&feature=youtu.be
>>>>
>>>> this is too real , the future is now.
>>>>  ------------------------------
>>>>  Date: Sun, 25 Jan 2015 06:59:20 +0200
>>>> Subject: Re: DRE: CTS community mail
>>>> From: gieroadsteve@xxxxxxxxx
>>>> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>  Good morning.
>>>>  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1VqoFuffwes
>>>>
>>>>  On 25 January 2015 at 03:19, Di Lhong <geosaurus8@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>  Not sure if anyone is interested. But GuildWars 2 is 75% off until Sun
>>>> 25th.
>>>>
>>>>  GuildWars 2 also announced an expansion. The game is amazing so far
>>>> and the expansion looks good! Goodbye Diablo 3.
>>>>
>>>>  On Sun, Jan 25, 2015 at 12:41 AM, Ashraf Barendse <
>>>> ashraf.barendse@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>  So they are actually re-releasing both dmc and devil may cry 4
>>>>  seperately for next gen consoles.
>>>>
>>>> http://www.ign.com/articles/2014/12/15/dmc-definitive-edition-and-devil-may-cry-4-special-edition-coming-to-ps4-and-xbox-one
>>>>  they couldve just made it together.
>>>>
>>>>  On Sat, Jan 24, 2015 at 10:49 AM, richard moorcroft <
>>>> greattekkenmaster@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Buy the 450 one,, better price,, DLC and full game
>>>>   On Jan 24, 2015 10:47 AM, "Nicholas Robertson-Muir" <
>>>> nicmuir@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Just looked at the PS3 vs PS4 comparison of Saints Row: Gat Out of Hell.
>>>> I'm not a graphical whore, so I was going to get the PS3 version, but
>>>> oh my gawd.  The screen tear is so annoying.  I just wish I could cross
>>>> play the stuff on PS3.
>>>> That bundle is looking pretty nice tho, but it would mean that I've
>>>> bought the same game 3 times.
>>>> :/
>>>> R270 for Gat out of hell, or R450 for Saints row 4(and all DLC) and Gat
>>>> outta Hell.
>>>> Decisions, decisions.
>>>>  On 24 Jan 2015 08:22, "Nicholas Robertson-Muir" <nicmuir@xxxxxxxxx>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> It will sell by the gazillions
>>>>  On 23 Jan 2015 23:21, "Di Lhong" <geosaurus8@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lf4G54xSgno
>>>>
>>>>  Wonder how well this game will do.
>>>>
>>>>  On Fri, Jan 23, 2015 at 10:21 PM, richard moorcroft <
>>>> greattekkenmaster@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> OK I BLANE LB THEN , OK??
>>>>   On Jan 23, 2015 10:15 PM, "Ilitirit Sama" <ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>  Blame LB.
>>>>
>>>>  On Fri, Jan 23, 2015 at 10:12 PM, richard moorcroft <
>>>> greattekkenmaster@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> No I didn't,, I thought Tokido was doing the killing
>>>>   On Jan 23, 2015 10:05 PM, "Ilitirit Sama" <ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>  Erm... you do realise Tokido was the one getting comboed, right?
>>>>
>>>>  On Fri, Jan 23, 2015 at 7:48 PM, lindsey kiviets <
>>>> lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>  tokido is the sickest
>>>>
>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Pz-VKGVFaCo
>>>>
>>>> 18:20
>>>>  ------------------------------
>>>>  Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2015 19:13:32 +0200
>>>> Subject: RE: DRE: CTS community mail
>>>> From: nicmuir@xxxxxxxxx
>>>> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>
>>>> I don't feel the need for nerfs or buffs in GG yet.
>>>> I still want to explore stuff.
>>>> No opinion on Kamimodo myself.
>>>> Not yet anyways.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>   ------------------------------
>>>>
>>>> The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally
>>>> privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this e-mail
>>>> by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have received this communication in
>>>> error, please address with the subject heading "Received in error," send to
>>>> the original sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of it.
>>>> If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying,
>>>> distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it,
>>>> is prohibited and may be unlawful. Any opinions or advice contained in this
>>>> e-mail are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in the governing
>>>> KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions, conclusions and other information
>>>> in this e-mail and any attachments that do not relate to the official
>>>> business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed by it.
>>>>
>>>> KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or
>>>> error-free, as information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost,
>>>> destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses.
>>>>
>>>> This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG
>>>> International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing services
>>>> to you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a Swiss
>>>> entity that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent
>>>> firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International provides no
>>>> services to clients. Each member firm of KPMG International is a legally
>>>> distinct and separate entity and each describes itself as such. Information
>>>> about the structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can be
>>>> obtained from your KPMG representative.
>>>>
>>>> This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept by
>>>> AntiVirus software.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>  ------------------------------
>>>> The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally
>>>> privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this e-mail
>>>> by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have received this communication in
>>>> error, please address with the subject heading "Received in error," send to
>>>> the original sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of it.
>>>> If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying,
>>>> distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it,
>>>> is prohibited and may be unlawful. Any opinions or advice contained in this
>>>> e-mail are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in the governing
>>>> KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions, conclusions and other information
>>>> in this e-mail and any attachments that do not relate to the official
>>>> business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed by it.
>>>>
>>>> KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or
>>>> error-free, as information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost,
>>>> destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses.
>>>>
>>>> This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG
>>>> International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing services
>>>> to you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a Swiss
>>>> entity that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent
>>>> firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International provides no
>>>> services to clients. Each member firm of KPMG International is a legally
>>>> distinct and separate entity and each describes itself as such. Information
>>>> about the structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can be
>>>> obtained from your KPMG representative.
>>>>
>>>> This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept by
>>>> AntiVirus software.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>

JPEG image

Other related posts:

  1. Home
  2. cpt-fgc
  3. Archive
  4. 01-2015