Re: Cape Town Showdown is coming!

  • From: Ashraf Barendse <ashraf.barendse@xxxxxxxxx>
  • To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Mon, 6 Jul 2015 17:50:26 +0200

That was vrek funny.

Jeeva gets around.that dude always shows up in comments.

On Mon, Jul 6, 2015 at 5:08 PM, Ilitirit Sama <ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Lol at this

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pesQijZ479o


[image: Inline image 4]
The interesting part about this answer is that the definition about
whether or not black depends on the person answering the question. From
someone who mixes colours, white is not a colour because you cannot mix
colours together to get white, but black is. From a physics perspective,
black is not a colour (it absorbs all), but white is (as it's reflecting
all possible colours - it's the same as saying red + blue = colour). In
the real world, a tetrachromat, colour-blind or even blind person might
also give you a different answer, but in this simple example it would
probably depend on how the question was asked.



On Mon, Jul 6, 2015 at 4:35 PM, Manase Zote <bmlzote@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

*lol*
On 6 Jul 2015 16:32, "Ilitirit Sama" <ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Cancelled due to LB being a fraud.

On Mon, Jul 6, 2015 at 4:31 PM, Manase Zote <bmlzote@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

When is ssf2t invitational?
On 6 Jul 2015 16:27, "Nicholas Robertson-Muir" <nicmuir@xxxxxxxxx>
wrote:

To nerf or not to nerf...
I give you - Jojo's ASB, patched out an infinite for everybody.
Aaaannnnd done.
#Game Testing.

My fg banes for now. (Based on my opinion... just to get that clear)
UMVC3 - TOD combos from round start. Character choice limited at high
level play.
Ultra Street fighter 4 - Counterpick has massive influence.
Mortal Kombat X - plain old guesswork for thetplays. Breakers give no
advantage.
GGXrd - reeeeediculous damage from certain characters and pitiful
damage from others.
KOF13 - not played anymore :(
KOF2002um - character balance? Wtf is that?
Tekken - seriously? People still play that?
I seriously enjoy Jojos, it's too bad no-one else got interested in
it, but 30fps was a mistake.
On 6 Jul 2015 15:46, "Manase Zote" <bmlzote@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Insane!

On Mon, Jul 6, 2015 at 3:36 PM, Ilitirit Sama <ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx>
wrote:

Don't remember if this was posted


http://www.siliconera.com/2015/06/12/arc-system-works-acquires-the-rights-to-river-city-ransom-and-double-dragon/

http://www.arcsystemworks.jp/technos/

A new Double Dragon game by Arcsys? That would be godlike.


On Mon, Jul 6, 2015 at 3:32 PM, Ilitirit Sama <ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx>
wrote:

Their biggest mistake is taking cues from tournament players. Just
as good players don't necessarily make good coaches, they also don't
make
good game designers.

The competitive approach is that everything should be stupidly
strong and players should use their skill to adjust. This is good in
theory, but very hard to do in practice. They should leave stuff like
this
to professional Battle Directors, not gamers. Tournament players
should be
involved in testing, not design.

On Mon, Jul 6, 2015 at 3:22 PM, Stephen Scheidel <
gieroadsteve@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

If the guys making the games can't do a good job without fan
feedback then they are incompetent and should kill themselves.
Nobody has any balls anymore, be it a game,movie,album etc you are
only gonna get the good stuff if someone with a good idea gets to
realise
it without being forced in certain directions.
Art is not a fucking democracy.

But that ideal creative process makes investors disappear so ..
Sigh.



On Monday, 6 July 2015, Di Lhong <marongdin@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Some moves just can't simply be patched out by numbers...some
stuff needs to be removed or change it's "low/overhead" to something
else
completely.

I hope they make every character's variations either useful or
fun to play. I mean what's the point of Kitana's mournful
variation...

It would be hilariously broken if they scrapped the whole
variation idea and fused all 3 variation into 1 character...get
ready for
some broken ass shit if that happens lolz


On Mon, Jul 6, 2015 at 2:51 PM, Di Lhong <marongdin@xxxxxxxxx>
wrote:

Didn't scorp have some 70% combo during demo?

On Mon, Jul 6, 2015 at 2:48 PM, Donaldson, Alasdair <
alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Interesting posts from Viscant. I do wonder though if the NRS
games would’ve lost people regardless of their non-stop patching.
I guess
we’ll never know. And after all their MK9 patches, they still
couldn’t
balance the game properly. At least Injustice was balanced, not
that I was
particularly cheerful about the way in which they did it – like
the Bladam
walk speed nerf…



I wonder how Subby or Scorp would’ve been in MK9 if they hadn’t
nerfed them at the start.



*From:* cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:
cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] *On Behalf Of *Ilitirit Sama
*Sent:* 06 July 2015 2:26 PM

*To:* cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
*Subject:* Re: Cape Town Showdown is coming!



Hah. You should read some of the discussions I have with
people about this. They're simply just clueless.

"I play Honda in SFIV so I don't mind the slow walkspeed. In
fact, I'm glad that they are doing this!"

Doesn't realize that Honda and Ryu have the same walkspeed in
SFIV...



On Mon, Jul 6, 2015 at 2:24 PM, Donaldson, Alasdair <
alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

I really don’t get the idea of nerfing movement. How can that
in anyway help people? Who would possibly be in favour of this?
Sigh…





*From:* cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:
cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] *On Behalf Of *Ilitirit Sama
*Sent:* 06 July 2015 2:22 PM


*To:* cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
*Subject:* Re: Cape Town Showdown is coming!



I don’t know enough about SF to know whether SF5 is making
dumb decisions.

First thing to watch is movement speed and hitboxes. Both of
these were nerfed. That's your clearest indication that they
don't know
what they are doing.



On Mon, Jul 6, 2015 at 2:17 PM, Donaldson, Alasdair <
alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

I wonder about some of these changes to the regular
franchises.



The movement nerf in Tekken is retarded. I can’t think of any
good reason why it would happen. That’s about the only real
problem that I
have with the current build of T7. I expect some work on
normalising damage
for certain characters, but that’s about it. Also I don’t
understand the
whole 1 button throw break thing. That’s two major
nerfs/dumb-downs.



MK…well… I dunno. It’s hard to take MK seriously. MK9 was so
badly unbalanced that strategy didn’t exist. MKX seems way too
focussed on
the ‘get opponent to corner then pressure with 50/50 low/overhead
strings
that lead to half bar damage’. They’ve changed the game but not in
a good
way. Maybe it will work out in the end. I’m guessing that, like
with
Injustice, by the time the last patches of MKX hit, we won’t
recognise the
gameplay from the original build.



How about GG? I know that they dumbed down the whole roman
cancel thing, but overall xrd doesn’t seem to have too many stupid
decisions messing it up.



I don’t know enough about SF to know whether SF5 is making dumb
decisions.



*From:* cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:
cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] *On Behalf Of *Stephen Scheidel
*Sent:* 06 July 2015 2:08 PM


*To:* cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
*Subject:* Re: Cape Town Showdown is coming!



That's the problem with these games bruh, they expect us to
remember all these things in order to play their games.

Like why must I take responsibility for my gameplay when the
developers are actively trying to distract me with inputs and
timing.

Such bullshit that I must buy a game and then they expect me to
play it to get good.



On 6 July 2015 at 14:02, Donaldson, Alasdair <
alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

LB, is that you?



*From:* cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:
cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] *On Behalf Of *Stephen Scheidel
*Sent:* 06 July 2015 2:01 PM
*To:* cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
*Subject:* Re: Cape Town Showdown is coming!



LeL wut is spellan and culkulus.

who got tyme to lrn aneway?



On 6 July 2015 at 13:58, Donaldson, Alasdair <
alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

To be fair, the last one is only true if you’re more of a
sociolinguist than a grammar nazi.



*From:* cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:
cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] *On Behalf Of *Ilitirit Sama
*Sent:* 06 July 2015 1:57 PM
*To:* cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
*Subject:* Re: Cape Town Showdown is coming!



Will someone please shoot me.



[image: Image removed by sender. [​IMG]]

[image: Image removed by sender. upload_2015-7-6_13-53-50.png]

[image: Image removed by sender. [​IMG]]
------------------------------

The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be
legally privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee.
Access to this
e-mail by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have received this
communication in error, please address with the subject heading
"Received
in error," send to the original sender, then delete the e-mail and
destroy
any copies of it. If you are not the intended recipient, any
disclosure,
copying, distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in
reliance on it, is prohibited and may be unlawful. Any opinions or
advice
contained in this e-mail are subject to the terms and conditions
expressed
in the governing KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions,
conclusions and
other information in this e-mail and any attachments that do not
relate to
the official business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed
by it.

KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or
error-free, as information could be intercepted, corrupted,
amended, lost,
destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses.

This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative
("KPMG International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm
providing
services to you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG
International") is a
Swiss entity that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of
independent firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International
provides no services to clients. Each member firm of KPMG
International is
a legally distinct and separate entity and each describes itself
as such.
Information about the structure and jurisdiction of your local
KPMG member
firm can be obtained from your KPMG representative.

This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been
swept by AntiVirus software.


------------------------------

The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be
legally privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee.
Access to this
e-mail by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have received this
communication in error, please address with the subject heading
"Received
in error," send to the original sender, then delete the e-mail and
destroy
any copies of it. If you are not the intended recipient, any
disclosure,
copying, distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in
reliance on it, is prohibited and may be unlawful. Any opinions or
advice
contained in this e-mail are subject to the terms and conditions
expressed
in the governing KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions,
conclusions and
other information in this e-mail and any attachments that do not
relate to
the official business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed
by it.

KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or
error-free, as information could be intercepted, corrupted,
amended, lost,
destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses.

This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative
("KPMG International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm
providing
services to you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG
International") is a
Swiss entity that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of
independent firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International
provides no services to clients. Each member firm of KPMG
International is
a legally distinct and separate entity and each describes itself
as such.
Information about the structure and jurisdiction of your local
KPMG member
firm can be obtained from your KPMG representative.

This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been
swept by AntiVirus software.


------------------------------

The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be
legally privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee.
Access to this
e-mail by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have received this
communication in error, please address with the subject heading
"Received
in error," send to the original sender, then delete the e-mail and
destroy
any copies of it. If you are not the intended recipient, any
disclosure,
copying, distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in
reliance on it, is prohibited and may be unlawful. Any opinions or
advice
contained in this e-mail are subject to the terms and conditions
expressed
in the governing KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions,
conclusions and
other information in this e-mail and any attachments that do not
relate to
the official business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed
by it.

KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or
error-free, as information could be intercepted, corrupted,
amended, lost,
destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses.

This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative
("KPMG International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm
providing
services to you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG
International") is a
Swiss entity that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of
independent firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International
provides no services to clients. Each member firm of KPMG
International is
a legally distinct and separate entity and each describes itself
as such.
Information about the structure and jurisdiction of your local
KPMG member
firm can be obtained from your KPMG representative.

This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been
swept by AntiVirus software.


------------------------------

The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be
legally privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee.
Access to this
e-mail by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have received this
communication in error, please address with the subject heading
"Received
in error," send to the original sender, then delete the e-mail and
destroy
any copies of it. If you are not the intended recipient, any
disclosure,
copying, distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in
reliance on it, is prohibited and may be unlawful. Any opinions or
advice
contained in this e-mail are subject to the terms and conditions
expressed
in the governing KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions,
conclusions and
other information in this e-mail and any attachments that do not
relate to
the official business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed
by it.

KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or
error-free, as information could be intercepted, corrupted,
amended, lost,
destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses.

This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative
("KPMG International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm
providing
services to you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG
International") is a
Swiss entity that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of
independent firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International
provides no services to clients. Each member firm of KPMG
International is
a legally distinct and separate entity and each describes itself
as such.
Information about the structure and jurisdiction of your local
KPMG member
firm can be obtained from your KPMG representative.

This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been
swept by AntiVirus software.


------------------------------
The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be
legally privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee.
Access to this
e-mail by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have received this
communication in error, please address with the subject heading
"Received
in error," send to the original sender, then delete the e-mail and
destroy
any copies of it. If you are not the intended recipient, any
disclosure,
copying, distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in
reliance on it, is prohibited and may be unlawful. Any opinions or
advice
contained in this e-mail are subject to the terms and conditions
expressed
in the governing KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions,
conclusions and
other information in this e-mail and any attachments that do not
relate to
the official business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed
by it.

KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or
error-free, as information could be intercepted, corrupted,
amended, lost,
destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses.

This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative
("KPMG International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm
providing
services to you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG
International") is a
Swiss entity that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of
independent firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International
provides no services to clients. Each member firm of KPMG
International is
a legally distinct and separate entity and each describes itself
as such.
Information about the structure and jurisdiction of your local
KPMG member
firm can be obtained from your KPMG representative.

This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been
swept by AntiVirus software.









PNG image

JPEG image

Other related posts:

  1. Home
  2. cpt-fgc
  3. Archive
  4. 07-2015