That's a great place to be. Things get pretty interesting from that point onward. On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 9:18 AM, Donaldson, Alasdair < alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Ah okay. I’m still way back when they meet Brook… got a lot to catch up. > > > > *From:* cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] > *On Behalf Of *Nicholas Robertson-Muir > *Sent:* 14 January 2015 9:10 AM > *To:* cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > > *Subject:* RE: CTS community mail > > > > Near 600 somewhere... need to recover my old drive and see where I was. > > On 14 Jan 2015 08:56, "Donaldson, Alasdair" <alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx> > wrote: > > Once Piece screening? How far back are you? I have a good couple of > hundred episodes to clear. > > > > *From:* cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] > *On Behalf Of *Nicholas Robertson-Muir > *Sent:* 13 January 2015 10:08 PM > *To:* cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > *Subject:* Re: CTS community mail > > > > I'm there too. > Perhaps we should do a screening involving beer and a braai. > > On 13 Jan 2015 21:31, "Stephen Scheidel" <gieroadsteve@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > That reminds me. > > Commence OP catch up. > > > > Tenks Neek > > > > On 13 January 2015 at 21:24, Stephen Scheidel <gieroadsteve@xxxxxxxxx> > wrote: > > There are heaps. > > http://www.animeop.net/ > > > > On 13 January 2015 at 21:11, Nicholas Robertson-Muir <nicmuir@xxxxxxxxx> > wrote: > > Need some help. > Someone hooked me up with a website where I could watch Jojos and One > Piece. Can you oakes hook me up again? > > On 13 Jan 2015 17:42, "lindsey kiviets" <lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pj3hGDaDZqI > > hmm , WP hard mode. > > So much good memories > ------------------------------ > > Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2015 17:28:15 +0200 > Subject: RE: CTS community mail > From: nicmuir@xxxxxxxxx > To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > > Oh, right. > Lazy dumbass then. > > On 13 Jan 2015 17:12, "lindsey kiviets" <lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > i didnt say he was a scrub, i remember using the words lazy dumbass. > > dumbass for failing to punish because he didnt map his buttons and then > cry about it > lazy for relying on button maps in the first place > ------------------------------ > > Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2015 16:53:36 +0200 > Subject: Re: CTS community mail > From: ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx > To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > > Got quite a shock now. Thought it was my cousin that was stabbed at PnP. > Turns out she was just a witness. > > > http://www.news24.com/SouthAfrica/News/3-stabbed-with-scissors-in-Cape-Town-supermarket-20150113 > > > > On Tue, Jan 13, 2015 at 4:40 PM, Wynand-Ben <paashaasggx@xxxxxxxxxxx> > wrote: > > You could do odd stuff like that with most peoples dust launchers in > Reloaded. > > Dust gave the opponent a huge amount of untechable time on any hit during > the first X frames of the launch. So if you touched the guy just before > the X frames ended you could land before the guy recovers and continue the > combo starting from the ground. > ------------------------------ > > Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2015 16:14:13 +0200 > Subject: RE: CTS community mail > From: nicmuir@xxxxxxxxx > To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > > Hahahaha... perfect. > He was the next character of interest anyway. > > Thank Khan for that. > I'm still too busy to worry about him now, but definitly after I get back > to owning Paas' ass. :P > > Btw Paas, you make maniac difficulty Elphelt look like a joke. > > I found some interesting stuff with Tempkin yesterday. Using his dust as > the last attack after launching with one, allows him to get to the ground > fast enough to score more hits. Additionally, it seems that his opponent > gets no air recovery when hit by it. > That makes it pretty scary, on RC from air(after areal dust) you're > looking at a 50% damage combo total when he lands. He recovers good meter > too. > > On 13 Jan 2015 16:04, "Wynand-Ben" <paashaasggx@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Nick > > Our local low tier hero! > > SL is Slayer > ------------------------------ > > Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2015 16:02:11 +0200 > Subject: RE: CTS community mail > From: nicmuir@xxxxxxxxx > To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > > I used to RC with my thumb over 3 buttons, I got used to the default > layout quickly. > > Wait... by LB's+PRrog's... um... thinking. Does it mean that anyone using > something other than the default config is a scrub? Or worse, someone not > using the default controller even? > > Lmao at that GG tier list. Who is SL? I need to add them to my team. > > C tier fo life! > > > > > > > > ------------------------------ > > The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally > privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this e-mail > by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have received this communication in > error, please address with the subject heading "Received in error," send to > the original sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of it. > If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, > distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it, > is prohibited and may be unlawful. Any opinions or advice contained in this > e-mail are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in the governing > KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions, conclusions and other information > in this e-mail and any attachments that do not relate to the official > business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed by it. > > KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or error-free, > as information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost, destroyed, > arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses. > > This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG > International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing services > to you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a Swiss > entity that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent > firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International provides no > services to clients. Each member firm of KPMG International is a legally > distinct and separate entity and each describes itself as such. Information > about the structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can be > obtained from your KPMG representative. > > This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept by > AntiVirus software. > > ------------------------------ > The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally > privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this e-mail > by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have received this communication in > error, please address with the subject heading "Received in error," send to > the original sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of it. > If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, > distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it, > is prohibited and may be unlawful. Any opinions or advice contained in this > e-mail are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in the governing > KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions, conclusions and other information > in this e-mail and any attachments that do not relate to the official > business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed by it. > > KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or error-free, > as information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost, destroyed, > arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses. > > This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG > International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing services > to you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a Swiss > entity that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent > firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International provides no > services to clients. Each member firm of KPMG International is a legally > distinct and separate entity and each describes itself as such. Information > about the structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can be > obtained from your KPMG representative. > > This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept by > AntiVirus software. >