Re: CTS community mail
- From: Manase Zote <bmlzote@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Thu, 8 Jan 2015 21:12:45 +0200
Bridal express(both) plus grenade plus above average normals = too stronk...
On 4 Jan 2015 15:53, "Ryan Williams" <ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Paas *lol* Elphelt too stronk.
> On 4 Jan 2015 15:50, "Stephen Scheidel" <gieroadsteve@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>> So who is da bes at guilty giiya ? :P
>>
>> On Friday, January 2, 2015, Manase Zote <bmlzote@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>>> You would thrive with a rush-down character.
>>> On 2 Jan 2015 18:39, "Nicholas Robertson-Muir" <nicmuir@xxxxxxxxx>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On everyone's recommendation, I have started playing with Axl. Lord,
>>>> he feels odd, and nothing like Billy.
>>>> For some reason, when I play with him, I keep on pressing the wrong
>>>> buttons for his specials. Perhaps because I used to use some other
>>>> configuration on the first GG.
>>>> I need to play some matches, so that someone can beat it into me.
>>>> On 2 Jan 2015 09:03, "Nicholas Robertson-Muir" <nicmuir@xxxxxxxxx>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Ah, no, I'll play. Just don't expect ant new combos and such until I
>>>>> hit the lab.
>>>>>
>>>>> ...and I'll play the winner of that first to 20.
>>>>> On 1 Jan 2015 23:54, "Manase Zote" <bmlzote@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> @Nick,
>>>>>> So no potemkin on Saturday???
>>>>>>
>>>>>> @ SAP
>>>>>> FT20 at KOF '98 ultimate match final edition!!!
>>>>>> On 1 Jan 2015 23:17, "Nicholas Robertson-Muir" <nicmuir@xxxxxxxxx>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Who must I blame for sharing Dragon's Crown with me?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Can't...stop...playing...
>>>>>>> On 1 Jan 2015 20:42, "richard moorcroft" <
>>>>>>> greattekkenmaster@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Yes,, oh yes Its EXTREMELY NICE,, you should try it sometime
>>>>>>>> On Jan 1, 2015 8:07 PM, "lindsey kiviets" <lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> lol no,
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> i hear langebaan is nice.
>>>>>>>>> ------------------------------
>>>>>>>>> Date: Thu, 1 Jan 2015 19:08:20 +0200
>>>>>>>>> Subject: RE: CTS community mail
>>>>>>>>> From: greattekkenmaster@xxxxxxxxx
>>>>>>>>> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Langebaan,, wanna come pick me up??? Cause then I can have fun too
>>>>>>>>> at session
>>>>>>>>> On Jan 1, 2015 7:06 PM, "lindsey kiviets" <lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> whered you go for the holidays?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> ------------------------------
>>>>>>>>> Date: Thu, 1 Jan 2015 16:38:37 +0200
>>>>>>>>> Subject: RE: CTS community mail
>>>>>>>>> From: greattekkenmaster@xxxxxxxxx
>>>>>>>>> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I can't make it coming back on Sunday only,, I didn't want to miss
>>>>>>>>> it believe me
>>>>>>>>> On Jan 1, 2015 12:24 PM, "lindsey kiviets" <lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> il be there
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> coming back to cpt on Saturday, gna be there to poon you guys,
>>>>>>>>> good way to start the year off.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> filthy, you better come to the sesh
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> ------------------------------
>>>>>>>>> Date: Thu, 1 Jan 2015 11:55:19 +0200
>>>>>>>>> Subject: RE: CTS community mail
>>>>>>>>> From: greattekkenmaster@xxxxxxxxx
>>>>>>>>> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> It would be nice to have a Teleport ability,, so I can go where i
>>>>>>>>> want too
>>>>>>>>> On Jan 1, 2015 11:48 AM, "Ryan Williams" <ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx>
>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Sorry to hear that Rich.
>>>>>>>>> On 1 Jan 2015 11:41, "richard moorcroft" <
>>>>>>>>> greattekkenmaster@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I can't make the new years session its so sad
>>>>>>>>> On Jan 1, 2015 11:27 AM, "Wynand-Ben" <paashaasggx@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Cool
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Im there.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Guilty
>>>>>>>>> Gear
>>>>>>>>> Eks
>>>>>>>>> Hard
>>>>>>>>> !
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> ------------------------------
>>>>>>>>> Date: Thu, 1 Jan 2015 11:23:05 +0200
>>>>>>>>> Subject: RE: CTS community mail
>>>>>>>>> From: ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx
>>>>>>>>> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> This Sat at Jeeva's :)
>>>>>>>>> On 1 Jan 2015 11:18, "Wynand-Ben" <paashaasggx@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Sooo
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> When is the next session?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Back from my little holiday and stuff... starting again on monday
>>>>>>>>> :(
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> ------------------------------
>>>>>>>>> Date: Wed, 31 Dec 2014 23:04:26 +0200
>>>>>>>>> Subject: RE: CTS community mail
>>>>>>>>> From: bmlzote@xxxxxxxxx
>>>>>>>>> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I hope you got game because I want a ft5 against you at the
>>>>>>>>> session...
>>>>>>>>> On 30 Dec 2014 18:29, "lindsey kiviets" <lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> ya i dunno , it smells alot like taken.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> i dont like revenge movies.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I watched the croods, good cartoon movie. The voice of the father
>>>>>>>>> sounded so familiar , turns out it was nicholas cage, lol
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I lost at jhb vs cpt 5v5 in bb, i need to hold dat L. cant really
>>>>>>>>> talk smack now in xrd thread. I just need to silently poon all.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> ------------------------------
>>>>>>>>> Date: Tue, 30 Dec 2014 16:59:39 +0200
>>>>>>>>> Subject: Re: CTS community mail
>>>>>>>>> From: ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx
>>>>>>>>> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Just finished watching John Wick. The movie is kinda mediocre but
>>>>>>>>> the action scenes are top notch.
>>>>>>>>> On 30 Dec 2014 13:39, "Ilitirit Sama" <ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Finally made SMB my bitch. They even have this helpful message at
>>>>>>>>> the end telling you "Congrats! You have finished everying in NSMB!"
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On to Bayonetta 2 now. Man, what a game. I can see myself
>>>>>>>>> playing this for a while.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Stupid lol of the day:
>>>>>>>>> Beyond Thug Life (Beyond Scared Straight)
>>>>>>>>> <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d3QcfZhYBzo&feature=youtu.be>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Dec 29, 2014 at 9:15 PM, Ryan Williams <
>>>>>>>>> ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> *LOL*
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> That Jean though...
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> And Professor X looks (and sounds) like Dr. Evil *lol*
>>>>>>>>> On 29 Dec 2014 21:02, "lindsey kiviets" <lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Ex-Men: Jean Grey <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I-iMVsi0IuY>
>>>>>>>>> ------------------------------
>>>>>>>>> Date: Mon, 29 Dec 2014 15:59:16 +0200
>>>>>>>>> Subject: Re: CTS community mail
>>>>>>>>> From: ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx
>>>>>>>>> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> If you want to get really technical (read: anal) you can say that
>>>>>>>>> you'd also have to prove that married and unmarried are mutually
>>>>>>>>> exclusive
>>>>>>>>> states.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Consider polygamy: You can be married to 4 women, but then you
>>>>>>>>> divorce 1. To unmarry someone means to undo a marriage them. So
>>>>>>>>> technically in this case you are married and unmarried.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Dec 29, 2014 at 3:30 PM, sameegh jardine <
>>>>>>>>> sameegh@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> lol, hadn't considered that possibility :P
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Dec 29, 2014 at 1:10 PM, Ilitirit Sama <ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx
>>>>>>>>> > wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Correct, except if you use Constructive Logic. In that case you
>>>>>>>>> would be required to prove that Alice, Bob and Charlie are indeed a
>>>>>>>>> married
>>>>>>>>> or unmarried person, and you would not be able to use the Law of the
>>>>>>>>> Excluded Middle or Double Negation.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intuitionistic_logic
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Why is this important? Because Alice, Bob and Charlie may in fact
>>>>>>>>> be the name of animals (not people), which would either mean the
>>>>>>>>> answer is
>>>>>>>>> False or undecidable.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> But we are reasonable folk after all, so we can appeal to Occam's
>>>>>>>>> Razor to handle that.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Sun, Dec 28, 2014 at 9:25 PM, sameegh jardine <
>>>>>>>>> sameegh@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Yes, because irrespective of Alice's status the question being
>>>>>>>>> asked will be held true for either the first or second statement.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Sun, Dec 28, 2014 at 1:06 PM, Ilitirit Sama <ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx
>>>>>>>>> > wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> By the way, here's a riddle:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Bob is looking at Alice. Alice is looking at Charlie. Bob is
>>>>>>>>> married. Charlie is not.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Is a married person looking at an unmarried person?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
Other related posts:
