I'm definitely still interested in the topic....Unit Trains!
Rick
In a message dated 11/7/2013 11:43:38 P.M. Pacific Standard Time,
derekboles@xxxxxxxxxx writes:
Actually, I have given it a lot of thought and, no, I'm not joking.
What I am doing is responding to someone who feels that he's entitled
enough to try and close down a conversation among 1134 people because he's
decided that the topic no longer interests him.
Think about that.
Derek Boles
--- In cpsig@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, "Doug Cummings" <dougcummings@...> wrote:
moving
You are joking, of course. Think about it. The number of log hauls in the
19th century would have been staggering and rail was the prime way of
logs in those day where rivers and lakes or horses were not handy ortrains if
practical. I doubt if anyone knows when the first log train operated or
where it operated. If you want to take on that task go right ahead.
DEC
So, what's wrong with tracing the 19th century antecedents of unit
that's a subject that interests people here and it might go onindefinitely?
The last time I checked this was the Yahoo group of the Canadian Pacific
HISTORICAL Association.
"Who knows" what we might learn here!
Derek Boles
